检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵晶晶[1] 金杉杉 李楠杉 焦永红[1] Shao Jingjing;Jin Shanshan;Li Nanshan;Jiao Yonghong(Beijing Tongren Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100730,China;Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology,Beijing 100005,China)
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院科技处,100730 [2]北京眼科研究所,100059
出 处:《中华医学科研管理杂志》2021年第5期360-366,共7页Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
基 金:北京市属医院科研培育计划项目(PG2018002)。
摘 要:目的通过开展医院青年人才科研工作相关调查,了解影响其科研业绩的影响因素,并分析不同人员特征在科研工作主客观影响因素的差异,从而提出有针对性的培养策略。方法对医院45岁以下963位青年科研人员(医生、医技和科研系列)进行自编式问卷调查与科研业绩评定,重点分析人口学特征及科研动机、自我效能、团队支持和外部环境4个主客观因素对科研业绩的影响因素。结果单因素分析结果显示:学位、年龄、出国时间、行政职务、研究生导师、职称系列、职称等级和科室类别,对科研业绩的影响有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多元线性回归显示,研究生导师类别、学位、职称等级、科室类别、自我效能、出国时间及职称系列等影响程度依次递减。结论根据调查结果,重点将影响科研业绩的预测因素作为科研工作提升和人才培养的抓手,提出优化人才选拔机制、开展精准施策和科学考核评估的人才培养体系思路。Objective To investigate the influencing factors of the scientific research performance and analyze the differences between subjective and objective ones among the different characteristics of staffs in work and then propose tailored management strategies based on the research findings.Methods A total number of 963 young researchers under the age of 45(including doctors,medical technicians,scientific researchers)were surveyed and the impact on the scientific research performance of four subjective and objective factors including demographic characteristics and research motivation,self-efficacy,team support and the external environment were analyzed through self-developed questionnaire.Results The academic degree,age,time spent overseas,administrative position,postgraduate mentor,professional title and levels,category of departments on the scores of scientific research performance had reached statistical significance(P<0.05)by using Single factor analysis.The results showed that the impact on the scientific research performance followed a descending order of the category of postgraduate mentors,academic degree,professional title levels,the category of departments,self-efficacy,time spent overseas,and professional title series.Conclusions According to the survey,this research focuses on the predictive factors which affecting scientific research performance as the important methods of scientific research promotion and talent training,and puts forward to the ideas of talent training,scheme of optimizing talent selection,carrying out accurate policy implementation and scientific assessment.
分 类 号:R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188