非自然叙事学的核心概念与批评争议——布莱恩·理查森教授访谈录  

Core Concepts and Critical Debates of Unnatural Narratology:An Interview with Professor Brian Richardson

作　　者：李亚飞 布莱恩·理查森 LI Yafei;Brian Richardson(School of Foreign Languages,University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu 611731,China;Department of English,University of Maryland,College Park MD 20742,USA)

机构地区：[1]电子科技大学外国语学院,四川成都6117312.美国马里兰大学英文系,马里兰大学公园20742

出　　处：《山东外语教学》2021年第5期3-8,共6页Shandong Foreign Language Teaching

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“当代西方叙事学前沿理论的翻译与研究”(项目编号:17ZDA281)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：本访谈围绕非自然叙事学的核心概念及弗鲁德里克和费伦等人对非自然叙事学理论属性的质疑展开。理查森教授在访谈中界定了非自然叙事,并将之与自然叙事、非模仿叙事等概念作了区分。他还详细阐述了非自然叙事的规约化问题。在理查森看来,非自然叙事指的是那些超越现实主义模仿规约的叙事实践,其核心在于反模仿。理查森教授在访谈中回应了弗鲁德尼克和费伦等人对非自然叙事学提出的批评。他指出,建构非自然叙事学的目的,在于通过聚焦反模仿叙事来对整体性的叙事诗学作出修正和拓展,以使叙事理论体系更为完整。谈及非自然叙事学的未来发展方向时,理查森认为寻求不同叙事研究流派之间的对话是推进非自然叙事学进一步发展的重要路径。This interview deals with the core concepts and Fludernik’s and Phelan’s skepticism about the theoretical vigor of unnatural narratology.Professor Richardson delineates unnatural narrative as a critical concept and distinguishes it from other related terms such as natural narrative and nonmimetic narrative.He further explains the conventionalization of unnatural narrative.For Richardson,unnatural narrative denotes the narrative practice defying realist mimetic conventions,with antimimeticism as its defining feature.In addition,Richardson responds to the criticisms about unnatural narratology launched by Monika Fludernik and James Phelan.He argues that unnatural narratology seeks to complement current narrative poetics through focusing on unnatural narratives.Richardson further points out that the collaborations between different sub-strands of postclassical narratology is the direction for the future development of unnatural narratology.

关 键 词：布莱恩·理查森 非自然叙事 反模仿 后经典叙事学 

分 类 号：I106[文学—世界文学]