机构地区:[1]温州医科大学附属第一医院心血管内科,浙江温州325015
出 处:《温州医科大学学报》2021年第10期793-799,共7页Journal of Wenzhou Medical University
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(81600341);浙江省自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(LQ15H020005);浙江省科技计划项目(2021RC091);温州市科技计划项目(Y20190616)。
摘 要:目的:探讨在单支架横跨支架术式治疗左主干分叉病变中,使用血管内超声(IVUS)动态观察最终对吻技术对分叉区域解剖结构的影响。方法:前瞻性入组36例左主干分叉病变且行单支架横跨术式,所有患者在术前分别从前降支(run1)、回旋支(run2)回拉IVUS,支架释放后从前降支回拉IVUS(run3),最终对吻后分别从前降支(run4)、回旋支(run5)回拉IVUS;分析患者的临床特征、造影资料和IVUS数据。结果:患者年龄(63.8±12.1)岁,左主干真性分叉病变占22.2%。相较于术前IVUS(run2),最终对吻术后的IVUS(run5)发现回旋支开口处管腔面积[(7.30±3.08)mm^(2) vs(.6.37±2.66)mm^(2),P<0.05]和血管面积[(13.10±3.27)mm^(2) vs.(12.47±2.93)mm^(2),P=0.012]均明显减小,而斑块面积差异无统计学意义[(5.80±2.02)mm^(2) vs.(6.10±2.09)mm^(2),P=0.128];回旋支开口处管腔面积变化与血管面积变化相关(r=0.787,P<0.001),而与斑块面积变化不相关(r=0.187,P=0.276)。相较于支架释放后IVUS(run3),最终对吻术后的IVUS(run4)发现多边形区域面积[(9.80±2.09)mm^(2) vs.(11.48±2.65)mm^(2),P<0.05]、左主干远端面积[(9.91±1.73)mm^(2) vs.(11.85±2.38)mm^(2),P<0.05]和左主干最小支架内面积[(9.61±1.53)mm^(2) vs(.11.34±2.33)mm^(2),P<0.05]均明显增加,支架贴壁不良现象减少(83.3%vs.61.1%,P=0.035),但是伴随支架不对称指数增加,多边形区域(1.23±0.14 vs.1.33±0.12,P<0.05);左主干远端(1.18±0.09 vs.1.25±0.10,P<0.05);左主干最小管腔面积处(1.17±0.09 vs.1.24±0.10,P<0.05)。结论:在左主干分叉病变行单支架横跨支架术中,最终对吻后回旋支开口面积明显减小,与嵴移位相关;最终对吻增加左主干及多边形区域支架内面积,减少支架贴壁不良现象,但是会增加支架不对称指数。Objective:To investigate the impact of final kissing balloon inflation(FKBI)on anatomical structure in single-stent crossover technique for left main artery bifurcation lesions with serial intravascular ultrasound(IVUS)imaging.Methods:Totally,36 patients with left main artery bifurcation lesions were prospectively enrolled,and treated with single-stent crossover strategy.Serial IVUS pullback examinations were performed,including the runs of pre-intervention from both left anterior descending artery(LAD,run1)and left circumflex artery(LCX,run2),the run of post-stenting from LAD(run3),and the runs of post-FKBI from both LAD(run4)and LCX(run5).Results:The mean age of these patients was(63.8±12.1)years old,with left main true bifurcation lesion accounting for 22.2%.Compared with IVUS imaging of pre-intervention(run2),the ostium area of LCX was significantly decreased after FKBI[run5,(7.30±3.08)mm^(2) vs.(6.37±2.66)mm^(2),P<0.001],as well as vessel area[(13.10±3.27)mm^(2) vs.(12.47±2.93)mm^(2),P=0.012],however,there was no significant changes in plaque area[(5.80±2.02)mm^(2) vs.(6.10±2.09)mm^(2),P=0.128].The change in lumen area within the LCX ostium was positively correlated with the change in EEM area(r=0.787,P<0.05),but not with plaque area(r=0.187,P=0.276).Compared with IVUS imaging of post-stenting(run3),FKBI(run4)significantly increased the area at the site of polygon of confluence[POC,(9.80±2.09)mm^(2) vs.(11.48±2.65)mm^(2),P<0.05],distal left main[(9.91±1.73)mm^(2) vs.(11.85±2.38)mm^(2),P<0.05]and the minimal lumen area(MLA)of the left main[(9.61±1.53)mm^(2) vs.(11.34±2.33)mm^(2),P<0.05],decreased stent malapposition phenomena(83.3%vs.61.1%,P=0.035),but increased the stent asymmetry index significantly(POC:1.23±0.14 vs.1.33±0.12,P<0.05;Distal LM:1.18±0.09 vs.1.25±0.10,P<0.05;MLA:1.17±0.09 vs.1.24±0.10,P<0.05).Conclusion:Our analysis showed that carina shift,instead of plaque shift,was the main mechanism of LCX ostium compromise after FKBI in single-stent crossover technique for left-main bif
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...