中国足协处罚权研究  

Research on the Penalty Power of Chinese Football Association

作　　者：邓小兵[1] 王阿丽 DENG Xiaobing;WANG Ali(Law School,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China)

机构地区：[1]兰州大学法学院,兰州730000

出　　处：《河北体育学院学报》2021年第6期36-43,共8页Journal of Hebei Sport University

基　　金：2020甘肃省体育局重点项目“甘肃体育法治‘十四五’规划专题研究”。

摘　　要：中国足协的处罚权是其参与体育治理的重要手段,相较于法定性强、形态有限的行政处罚,更具专业性和针对性。为了保障其良性运转,维护相对人的诉讼权利,司法权的适度介入已成为理论界的共识。但我国传统的行政主体理论不能回应这种社会公权力发展的现实需要,并对其作出合理解释。因此,亟需重构我国的行政主体理论,赋予中国足协行政主体地位,构建司法审查规则,即法院审查足协处罚权时应当遵循仲裁优先原则、穷尽内部救济原则、法律审查原则;在审查范围上,除了审查足协处罚行为,还应当附带审查处罚规则。The penalty power of the Chinese Football Association is an important means for it to par-ticipate in sports governance. Compared with the administrative penalty with strong legality and lim-ited form, it is more professional and targeted. In order to ensure its sound operation and safeguard the litigation rights of the opposite party, the appropriate intervention of judicial power has become a consensus in the theoretical circle. However, Chinese traditional administrative subject theory cannot respond to the practical needs of the development of social public power and make a reasonable expla-nation. Therefore, it is urgent to reconstruct Chinese administrative subject theory, endow the Chi-nese Football Association with the status of administrative subject, and construct the rules of judicial review, that is, when the court reviews the penalty right of the Football Association, it should follow the principles of arbitration priority, exhaustion of internal remedies and legal review. In terms of the scope of review, in addition to reviewing the penalty of the Football Association, it should also be ac-companied by the review penalty rules.

关 键 词：单项体育协会 社会公权力 行政主体 行政处罚 司法审查 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]