从“东洋史”到“东亚史”——韩国学界近三十年的历史叙事反思  

From“Oriental History”to“East Asian History”:A Reflection on the Historical Discourse in Korean Academia of the Past 30 Years

作　　者：安洙英 姜伊威 An Sooyoung;Jiang Yiwei

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学人文学院世界史系,200234 [2]复旦大学文史研究院,200433

出　　处：《史学理论研究》2021年第5期73-85,159,共14页Historiography Bimonthly

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“20世纪的历史学和历史学家”(项目编号:19ZDA235)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：20世纪90年代以后,韩国史学界对既有历史研究中的民族主义、现代主义和欧洲中心主义进行反思;与此同时,把东亚作为一个地区单位思考的学术倾向明显抬头,由此开始了构建东亚史的努力。有关东亚史的内容和方法的讨论一直持续至今,这启发韩国史学界转换历史理解的方式和观点。因此,通过概括东亚史的形成脉络和韩国学界近三十年来的相关讨论,我们可以一窥韩国史学界的整体变化方向。2007年,东亚史正式进入韩国国民教育体系,成为一个独立的历史课程。以韩国为出发点梳理这一史学史过程,特别是其中与中日史学的对比和关联,并进一步思考东亚史和民族国家论述之间的张力变迁,有助于我们理解20世纪后半叶以来的全球史、区域史思潮对东亚国家历史观念的影响。Since the 1990 s,Korean historians have reflected on nationalism,modernism,and Eurocentrism in existing historical studies.At the same time,many researchers have endorsed conceptualization of East Asia as a regional unit of historical analysis,which led to the institutionalization of"East Asian History".Discussions on"East Asian History"have continued to this day,inspiring Korean historians to revise their narratives of and perspectives on historical understanding.Therefore,by reviewing the process of the institutionalization and formalization of"East Asian History"and the relevant discussions in Korean academia in the past thirty years,we can have a glimpse of the overall context of Korean historiography.And in 2007,"East Asian History"formally entered the national education system and beamed an independent history course.In this article,we offer an overview of the historiographical trajectory in Korea by comparing it with and relate it to their counterparts in China and Japan.By reflecting upon the changing tension between"East Asian History"and the discourse of nation-state,we strive to understand how the historiographical trends of global history and regional history have influenced historical views of East Asian countries since the second half of the twentieth century.

关 键 词：韩国史学 东亚史 区域史 历史叙述 历史教育 

分 类 号：K31[历史地理—历史学]