检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:武东方 WU Dongfang(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海201620
出 处:《商丘职业技术学院学报》2021年第5期7-12,共6页JOURNAL OF SHANGQIU POLYTECHNIC
基 金:2020年度华东政法大学研究生创新能力培养专项资金资助项目“行踪轨迹信息的刑法保护”(2020-4-070)。
摘 要:行踪轨迹信息作为公民个人信息中较为重要的一类,刑法对其进行了差异化保护。但司法实践中,出现了诸如针对行踪轨迹信息重视不足、区分不清、说理不明的问题。行踪轨迹信息不仅具有公民个人信息的普遍属性,还具有人身利益的特有属性,具有刑法特殊保护的必要性。针对行踪轨迹信息,我们应当根据其属性科学厘定其内涵,并通过解释限制其外延。我们还应该通过完善前置法相关规定以对其进行更为全面的差异化保护。As a relatively important category of citizens’ personal information, whereabouts information is protected by the criminal law. However, in judicial practice, there have been problems such as insufficient attention to information about whereabouts, unclear distinction, and unclear reasoning. The track information not only has the general attributes of citizens’ personal information, but also has the unique attributes of personal interests, which is necessary for the special protection of criminal law. Regarding the track information, we should scientifically determine its connotation based on its attributes, and limit its extension through interpretation. Based on the uniformity requirements of the legal system, we should also improve the relevant provisions of the pre-law to provide more comprehensive and differentiated protection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7