因明学"宗声"理论释义新探——从对贾曹杰大师的"则因三相丧失论证正因之能力"解释说起  

A Study on the Different Explanations of the"Thesis of Sound"Theory:Starting from the Explanation of rGyal tshab Dar ma Rin chen's"Trair apya Loses the Ability of Argumentation"

作　　者：夏吾太 Sha bo thar(the Institute of Logic and Cognition of Sun Yat-Sen University;the School of Tibetology of Qinghai Minzu University)

机构地区：[1]中山大学认知与逻辑研究所 [2]青海民族大学藏学院

出　　处：《中国藏学（藏文版）》2021年第3期92-105,共14页CHINA TIBETOLOGY

基　　金：国家社科基金项目《古印度因明学思维逻辑“论式”之研究》(项目批准号:17CZX050)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：关于因明"宗声"理论,贾曹杰大师在《释量论疏》中说:"如用同品和异品之法之眼识所取境论证声为无常法和声为常法,则此论式的第一相会分别成立。如第一相成立,则因三相丧失了论证正因之能力。"这一表述在格鲁派的教学体系中有不同的解释,尤其是至尊却吉坚赞和班钦·紫南扎巴对此注解有较大差异。文章通过对相关藏文文献的梳理和研究,揭示这两位因明大师的注解思想和理论。About the"Thesis of Sound"theory of epistemology,rGyal-tshab Dar-ma Rin-chen stated in Praminavirttika Commentary:"If you use the same and different examples'attachment region of eye-perception to prove that the sound is impermanent and permanent,then the first phase of Trairipya is established respectively.If the first phase is established,the Trairupya loses the ability of argumentation in this way."This sentence has different interpretations in the teaching system of Geluk School,especially the annotations of rJe btsun Chos-kyi rGyal-mtshan and Pan chen bSod-nams Grags-pa are quite different.Therefore,this article reveals the annotation thoughts and theories of two Hetuvidya masters through combing and researching relevant Tibetan literature.

关 键 词：宗声 贾曹杰 因明学 

分 类 号：B946.6[哲学宗教—宗教学]