检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:茹秋乐 RU Qiule(Koguan School of Law, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)
出 处:《广东石油化工学院学报》2021年第5期21-24,共4页Journal of Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology
摘 要:《侵权责任法》第十二条规定,无意思联络数人侵权这一侵权类型,是以按份责任的方式来划分责任。文章为探讨该法条规定的责任承担方式之合理性,通过梳理该法条规定的按份责任与其他法条所规定的责任承担方式存在的冲突,对“按份责任说”和“连带责任说”进行辨析,并结合域外法中普遍采取连带责任的立法模式,得出在无意思联络数人侵权制度中,连带责任是更优的立法选择的结论。我国应修改相关立法,以保护受害人的利益,达成侵权法内外价值的统一。Article 12 of the Tort Law stipulates that where two or more persons commit torts respectively,causing the same harm,if the seriousness of liability of each tortfeasor can be determined,the tortfeasors shall assume corresponding liabilities respectively;or if the seriousness of liability of each tortfeasor is hard to be determined,the tortfeasors shall evenly assume the compensatory liability.In order to explore the reasonableness of this term,this paper summarizes and analyzes the“shared liability”and“joint and several liability”in the joint tort without conscious cooperation,and concludes the supporting reasons for them.Referring to foreign laws,this paper suggests that joint and several liability is a better legislative choice,and our current legislation should be amended to effectively protect the interests of victims.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.147.87