凯尔森宪法思想的法哲学背景——兼评政治宪法学与规范宪法学之争  

The Legal Philosophy Background of Kelsen's Constitutional Thought——On the Dispute between Political Constitution and Normative Constitution

作　　者：吕顺 Lv Shun(Guangxi Normal University,Guilin Guangxi 541006)

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学,广西桂林541006

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2021年第4期12-18,共7页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

摘　　要：凯尔森的宪法思想根植于其法哲学背景,特别是纯粹法理论中的两个重要部分:规范的层级结构理论与基础规范的概念。而施密特对凯尔森的批评、对这些批评做出的回应,是理解凯尔森宪法思想的重要途径。在当代中国政治宪法学与规范宪法学的争论中,存在着部分政治宪法学学者对施密特不成功的“复活”,以及规范宪法学学者对凯尔森一些基本命题的背离。Kelsen’s constitutional thoughts is rooted in his legal philosophy background,especially the two important parts of the pure theory of law:the hierarchy of norms and the concept of basic norms.Schmidt's criticism of Kelsen and his response to these criticisms are an important way to understand Kelsen's constitutional thoughts.In the dispute between contemporary Chinese political constitution and normative constitution,there are some political constitution scholars'unsuccessful“resurrection”of Schmidt,and normative constitution scholars’deviation from some basic propositions of Kelsen.

关 键 词：凯尔森 纯粹法理论 基础规范 规范宪法学 

分 类 号：DF2[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]