国际合作网络演化与影响研究:CAS和MPG的比较  

Evolution and Impact of International Cooperation Networks:A Comparison between CAS and MPG

作　　者：王玲俐 裴瑞敏[3] 杨梅 王建华 李虹 Wang Lingli;Pei Ruimin;Yang Mei;Wang Jianhua;Li Hong(School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190;Bureau of International Cooperation,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100864;Institutes of Science and Development,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190)

机构地区：[1]中国科学院大学经济与管理学院,北京100190 [2]中国科学院国际合作局,北京100864 [3]中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,北京100190

出　　处：《管理评论》2021年第9期89-96,共8页Management Review

摘　　要：本文采用科学计量学和社会网络分析的方法,以细胞生物学领域为例,选取中国科学院(CAS)和德国马普学会(MPG)发表的科研论文为样本数据,比较研究了CAS和MPG在细胞生物学领域的国际合作网络的结构、特点和发展趋势。研究结果显示:CAS在细胞生物学领域呈现更快的上升发展趋势;在合作广度方面,MPG要优于CAS;在合作紧密度和发展趋势方面,CAS要优于MPG。回归分析结果表明,国际合作强度与科研人员的研究表现之间存在正向相关关系。Using the method of scietometric and social network analysis,and taking the field of cell biology as an example,this paper selects the scientific research papers published by Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS)and German Max Planck Institute(MPG)as sample data,and compares the structure,characteristics and development trend of international network of science and technology cooperation of CAS and MPG in the field of cell biology.Results show that CAS shows a faster growth trend in the field of cell biology.In terms of the range of international science and technology cooperation,the range of MPG's cooperation with other countries is wider than that of CAS.CAS is superior to MPG in terms of the closeness of the cooperation.The results of regression analysis show that there is a positive correlation between the intensity of international research collaboration and the research performance of researchers.The above conclusions have the implications for the international science and technology collaboration policy making and pracitices.

关 键 词：国际科技合作 合作网络 演化分析 中国科学院 德国马普学会 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学]