机构地区:[1]广东三九脑科医院康复治疗科,广州市510510 [2]中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院康复医学科 [3]广东三九脑科医院康复医学科 [4]广东省康复与养老工程技术研究中心
出 处:《中国康复医学杂志》2021年第10期1227-1232,共6页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81772447);国家自然科学基金青年项目(81902290);广东省医学科研基金(A2018172);广东省医学科研基金(A2021407);广州市科技局产学研协同创新重大专项(201704020140);逸仙临床研究培育项目(SYS-Q-201803)。
摘 要:目的:观察经颅直流电刺激(transcranial direct current stimulation,t DCS)同步基于正常行走模式的下肢多通道功能性电刺激(functional electrical stimulation,FES)对脑卒中偏瘫恢复期患者下肢运动功能的影响。方法:66例符合入组条件的脑卒中偏瘫患者,分层后随机分成3组:t DCS组(n=22)、FES组(n=22)、同步组(n=22)。t DCS组给予头部t DCS治疗同步下肢安慰FES治疗;FES组给予头部安慰t DCS治疗同步下肢FES治疗;同步组给予头部t DCS治疗同步下肢FES治疗。治疗20min/次、1次/d、连续治疗12d。在治疗前(T0)、治疗6次(T1)及治疗12次(T2)后分别采用下列量表评估:脑卒中患者姿势评分(PASS)、Fugl-Meyer下肢运动功能评定(FMA-L)、Berg平衡量表(BBS)、计时"起立-行走"测试(TUGT)、改良Barthel指数(MBI)。结果:治疗前3组患者各评定结果之间的差异无显著性。治疗12次后,三组患者的BBS、TUGT、MBI(下肢)及FES组和同步组的PASS较治疗前差异有显著性(P<0.05)。变化率比较,治疗12次后三组患者FMA-L、BBS、TUGT、MBI(下肢)及FES组和同步组的PASS的变化率,较治疗6次时变化率差异均有显著性。t DCS组与FES组比较,MBI(下肢)差异有显著性(P<0.05);同步组与t DCS组比较,PASS、MBI(下肢)差异有显著性(P<0.05);同步组与FES组比较BBS变化率差异有显著性(P<0.05)。其余变化差异无显著性。结论:三种方法均可有效改善脑卒中后恢复期偏瘫患者的下肢功能,t DCS同步FES的治疗在部分评估指标方面的疗效优于单用t DCS或单用FES治疗。Objective:To observe the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS) synchronized multi-channel functional electrical stimulation(FES) based on normal walking pattern on lower limb motor function in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia.Method:A total of 66 patients with stroke and hemiplegia were randomly divided into t DCS group(n=22),FES group(n=22), and synchronous group(n=22) after stratification. The t DCS group was given head t DCS treatment and lower extremity sham FES treatment,the FES group was given head sham t DCS treatment and lower extremity FES treatment,and the synchronous group was given head t DCS treatment and lower extremity FES treatment. The treatment was 20 min/time, 1 time/d, for 12 days. Before treatment(T0),6 times(T1)and 12 times(T2), the following scales were used to evaluate:posture assessment of stroke scale(PASS),Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity(FMA-L), Berg balance scale(BBS), timed "up&go" test(TUGT),modified Barthel index(MBI).Result:There was no significant difference between the evaluation results of the 3 groups before treatment. After treatments for 12 times,the BBS,TUGT,MBI(lower limbs) of the 3 groups and the PASS of the FES group and the synchronization group were significantly different compared with that before treatment(P<0.05).And after treatments for 12 times,the rate of change of FMA-L,BBS,TUGT,MBI(lower limbs) of the 3 groups and the rate of change of PASS of the FES group and the synchronization group were significantly different with that after treatments for 6 times. Comparing the t DCS group with the FES group,the difference in MBI(lower limbs) was significant(P<0.05);comparing the synchronization group with the t DCS group,the difference in PASS and MBI(lower limbs) was significant(P<0.05);There was a significant difference in the BBS change rate between the synchronization group and the FES group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in other indicators(P>0.05).Conclusion:Three methods can effectively improve the lower limb function o
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...