检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:解晋伟 XIE Jin-wei
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200063
出 处:《江苏警官学院学报》2021年第4期12-20,共9页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute
基 金:华东政法大学第十二期博士研究生海外调研资助项目。
摘 要:人格尊严,作为我国宪法第38条所保障的公民基本权利,应当对其他部门法的制定和修改具有规范作用。就目前来看,不但学界对宪法规定的人格尊严概念及其功能存在分歧,即便立法机关对此也存在模糊不清的现象,一些部门法所规定的人格尊严概念及其功能也各不相同。我国有十五部现行法律对人格尊严作出了规定,就其所发挥的功能而言,可划分为四种类型,即概括性权利、一般个别性权利、法律原则和价值基础。在人格尊严所涉及的权利范围界定方面,学界也存在争议。为保持法律体系的协调性与统一性,此种情况值得引起有关部门反思并尽快加以解决。Personal dignity,as the basic right of citizens guaranteed by article 38 of the Constitution of China,should play a normative role in the formulation and modification of other department laws.At present,not only the academic circles have different opinions on the concept and function of human dignity stipulated by the Constitution,but also the legislative organs are unclear about it,and the concept and function of human dignity stipulated by some department laws are different.There are 15 laws in force in China which make provisions on human dignity,which can be divided into four types,namely,general right,general individual right,legal principle and value basis.In terms of the definition of rights involved in human dignity,there are also controversies in academic circles.In order to maintain the coordination and unity of the legal system,this situation is worth causing the relevant departments to reflect on and solve it as soon as possible.
分 类 号:D911.01[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7