检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王博 刘迪 李嘉南 陈露露 张馨月 马颐宁 杨小红 蒋文杰 WANG Bo;LIU Di;LI Jia-nan;CHEN Lu-lu;ZHANG Xin-yue;MA Yi-ning;YANG Xiao-hong;JIANG Wen-jie(Hair Transplan-tation Center,Plastic Surgery Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences&Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100144,China)
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院北京协和医学院整形外科医院毛发移植中心,北京100144 [2]西南医科大学附属中医医院,四川泸州646000 [3]国家卫生健康委科学技术研究所,北京协和医学院研究生院,北京100081
出 处:《中国美容整形外科杂志》2021年第10期596-597,共2页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨平行四边形切口和梭形切口头皮条切取法毛囊单位获得率的差异。方法自2017年10月至2020年1月,中国医学科学院北京协和医学院整形外科医院毛发移植中心对127例患者分别采用平行四边形切口和梭形切口头皮条法获得毛囊,统计1 cm2头皮条的毛囊数量,采用配对t检验比较平行四边形切口和梭形切口两种方法的毛囊获得率差异。结果平行四边形切口切取法的毛囊单位获得率显著高于梭形切口切取法,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用平行四边形切口头皮条法可以获得更多的毛囊数量,减少毛囊的损耗。Objective To explore the differences between parallelogram incision and fusiformis incision in the harvest of hair follicular unit. Methods From October 2017 to January 2020, the hair follicles in 127 patients were harvested by parallelogram incision or fusiformis incision. The number of hair follicles in 1 cm2 scalp stripe were calculated. The differences of follicular unit acquirement rate between parallelogram incision and fusiform incision were compared by paired t-test. Results The hair follicle acquirement rate by parallelogram incision was significant higher than that by fusiformis incision. The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion In the harvest of hair follicles by scalp stripe method, parallelogram incision could achieve more hair follicles and less damages than fusiformis incision.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49