專利侵權訴訟程序中禁止反悔原則的具體適用標準  

Specific Criteria for Applying the Doctrine of Estoppel in Patent Infringement Proceedings

作　　者：商建剛 Shang Jiangang(Senior Judge of the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court)

机构地区：[1]上海知識産權法院

出　　处：《中国专利与商标》2021年第4期16-30,共15页China Patents & Trademarks

摘　　要：一、問題的提出我國的專利法相關司法解釋明確規定了禁止反悔原則,已成爲我國專利侵權司法實踐中的一項重要原則,然而禁止反悔原則的具體適用標準在司法實踐中尚不明確。2010年1月1日實施的《最高人民法院關於審理侵犯專利權糾紛案件應用法律若干問題的解釋》(以下簡稱“《專利侵權司法解釋(一)》)”第六條規定,專利申睛人、專利權人在專利授權或者無效宣告程序中,通週對權利要求、説明書的修改或者意見陳述放棄的技術方案。I.Issues raised The doctrine of estoppel is clearly defined in the judicial interpretations of the patent law of China and has become one of the important doctrines in the patent infringe-ment judicial practice in China.However,there are no clear criteria for applying the doctrine of estoppel in judicial practice.Article 6 of the Interpretation of the Supreme Peopled Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Disputes over Patent Infringement(hereinafter referred to as Patent Infringement Judicial Interpretation(I)),enacted on 1 January 2010,reads:if a technical solution was renounced by the applicant or the patentee during any patent prosecution or patent invalidation proceeding,either by amending the claim(s)or the description or by making observations。

关 键 词：最高人民法院 禁止反悔 宣告程序 司法 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]