“WADA诉俄罗斯反兴奋剂机构案”评析与启示  

WADA v.Russian Anti-Doping Agency":Review and Insights

作　　者：郑文迪 姜熙[2] DENG Wendi;JIANG Xi(Law School of Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China;Sports Law Research Institute of Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China)

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院法律学院,上海201701 [2]上海政法学院体育法治研究院,上海201701

出　　处：《体育科研》2021年第6期41-49,77,共10页Sport Science Research

基　　金：上海市曙光计划项目。

摘　　要：“WADA诉俄罗斯反兴奋剂机构案”作为史无前例的“史诗级”案件,值得深入研究。通过文献资料、逻辑分析等方法对该案进行了系统性分析,研究发现,“WADA诉俄罗斯反兴奋剂机构案”在仲裁庭组成、仲裁庭审查权行使、签约后果性质、运动员权利保护、比例原则、集体惩罚等方面存在一些值得探讨的问题。同时,该案也暴露出体育仲裁中存在的一些问题,例如国际体育仲裁院(CAS)仲裁庭的审查程度及审查内容等。最后,结合案件情况与反兴奋剂领域现状,提出该案对未来完善兴奋剂治理体系和签约方合规方面的启示。The case of"WADA v.Russian Anti-Doping Agency"is an unprecedented case that deserves in-depth study.The article analyzes the case systematically by means of literature review and logical analysis.It is found that the case of"WADA v.Russian Anti-Doping Agency"has some issues worthy of discussion:the composition of the tribunal,the exercise of the tribunal's review power,the nature of the contracting consequences,the protection of athletes'rights,the principle of proportionality,and collective punishment.Meanwhile,this case also reveals some problems in sports arbitration,such as the extent and content of the review by the CAS tribunal.Finally,in view of the circumstances of the case and the current situation in the anti-doping field,the article reveals the implications of the case for the future improvement of the doping governance system and signatory compliance.

关 键 词：体育法 反兴奋剂 体育仲裁 

分 类 号：G811[文化科学—体育学]