如何破解金钱之债引发的“合同僵局” ——以聚富公司诉赛某、王某房屋买卖合同纠纷案为切入点  

How to Solve the“Contract Deadlock”Caused by Money Debt——Taking Jufu Company V.Sai and Wang Housing Sales Contract Dispute as the Breakthrough Point

作　　者：徐晓月 XU Xiaoyue(Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200042

出　　处：《河北工程大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第3期70-76,共7页Journal of Hebei University of Engineering(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金(编号:13&ZD178)。

摘　　要：“合同僵局”并非伪命题,其在司法实践中真实存在。实践中由金钱之债引发的“合同僵局”时有发生。解除合同无疑是最好的选择,不仅可以使双方摆脱合同的束缚,免去诉累,也可节约社会资源,优化市场资源配置。遗憾的是《民法典》第五百八十条尽管为“合同僵局”提供了解决之法,但该条无法适用于金钱之债引起的“合同僵局”。在实践之中面对此类僵局,不同的法院的裁判路径不尽相同,且皆存在不足之处。目前,金钱之债造成的“合同僵局”,最佳的路径选择应当类推适用《民法典》第五百八十条第二款。“Contract deadlock”is not a false proposition,but a real one in judicial practice.In practice,the“contract deadlock”caused by money debt occurs from time to time.Rescinding the contract is undoubtedly the best choice.It can not only make both parties get rid of the shackles of the contract,but also save social resources and optimize the allocation of market resources.Unfortunately,although article 580 of the Civil Code provides a solution to“contract deadlock”,it cannot be applied to“contract deadlock”caused by money debt.In practice,in the face of this kind of deadlock,different courts have different adjudication paths,and there are shortcomings.At present,the best way to solve the“contract deadlock”caused by money debt is to apply the second paragraph of article 580 of the Civil Code by analogy.

关 键 词：合同僵局 违约方申请解除权 合同解除 金钱之债 

分 类 号：F812.8[经济管理—财政学]