财政分权、环境规制与农业生态效率  

Fiscal Decentralization, Environmental Regulation and Agricultural Eco-efficiency

作　　者：曹俐[1] 范黎明 雷岁江[2] Cao Li;Fan Liming;Lei Suijiang(College of Economics and Management,Shanghai Ocean University;Business School,Shanghai Dianji University,Shanghai 201306,China)

机构地区：[1]上海海洋大学经济管理学院 [2]上海电机学院商学院,上海201306

出　　处：《统计与决策》2021年第19期138-143,共6页Statistics & Decision

基　　金：国家自然科学基金面上项目(71873082);国家自然科学基金重点项目(71333010)。

摘　　要：文章基于包含两种非期望产出的超效率DEA-SBM模型测算了我国30个省份2012—2018年的农业生态效率,采用固定效应模型和门槛效应模型,揭示财政分权、环境规制与农业生态效率之间的内在机理。研究表明:财政分权对农业生态效率具有显著负向抑制作用,命令控制型环境规制和激励性碳排放交易规制均对农业生态效率具有显著正向促进作用;财政分权对激励性碳排放交易规制与农业生态效率间的调节作用显著为负;财政分权对命令控制型环境规制与农业生态效率间的调节作用存在单一门槛效应,财政分权低于门槛阈值时其调节作用显著为负,反之为正。基于此,建议加大环境规制力度,优化财政分权结构,完善绿色考核机制,从而促进农业高质量发展。This paper is based on the super-efficiency DEA-SBM model containing two kinds of undesirable outputs to measure the agricultural eco-efficiency of 30 provinces in China from 2012 to 2017, and then adopts the fixed effect model and threshold effect model to reveal the internal mechanism among fiscal decentralization, environmental regulation and agricultural eco-efficiency. The results are shown as follows: Fiscal decentralization has significant negative inhibition effect on agricultural eco-efficiency;both command-and-control environmental regulation and incentive carbon emission trading regulation have significant positive promotion effect on agricultural eco-efficiency. Fiscal decentralization has a significant negative moderating effect on the relationship between incentive carbon emission trading regulations and agricultural eco-efficiency. Fiscal decentralization has a single threshold effect on the moderating effect between command-and-control environmental regulation and agricultural eco-efficiency;when fiscal decentralization is lower than the threshold value, its moderating effect is significantly negative;otherwise, it is positive. On this basis, it is suggested to strengthen environmental regulation, optimize fiscal decentralization structure and improve green assessment mechanism, so as to promote high-quality agricultural development.

关 键 词：环境规制 财政分权 农业生态效率 调节作用 门槛效应 

分 类 号：F062.2[经济管理—政治经济学]