南宋儒林之苏、黄优劣论及其实质  

Evaluations of Su Shi and Huang Tingjian by Scholars in the Southern Song Dynasty

作　　者：左志南 ZUO Zhi-nan(Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Southwest Minzu University,Chengdu,Sichuan,610041)

机构地区：[1]西南民族大学中国语言文学与新闻传播学院,四川成都610041

出　　处：《新疆大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第6期117-124,共8页Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“两宋之交理学嬗变与诗文流变的双向考察”(编号:17XZW027)阶段性成果;西南民族大学—四川省社会科学重点研究基地杜甫研究中心资助项目“宋元注杜倾向与杜诗学演变研究”(编号DFYZYGX202001)附属成果。

摘　　要：文学史上得以并称的苏、黄,在南宋诸儒处却有着崇抑、优劣之别。南宋诸儒对黄庭坚赞许有加,对苏轼则有诸多批评,甚至有许多出于意气的贬损。其实质在于黄庭坚之儒学修养自觉意识较强,其指向也符合了宋儒关于人格境界的界定;南宋诸儒抨击苏轼儒学修养自觉意识缺失,认为其儒学思想多有不纯正处。这种现象的出现是宋学发展的必然,是理学体系日趋成熟,话语权日趋强势的一种表现。Su Shi and Huang Tingjian,two prominent literary figures simultaneously in the Southern Song Dynasty,were evaluated quite differently by Confucianism scholars at that time.Huang Tingjian was highly praised,while Su Shi was criticized and even belittled.Its difference lies in that Huang's consciousness of Confucian self-cultivation was obvious,and his cultivation also conformed to the Confucian connotation of personality in the Song Dynasty.Su Shi was criticized for his lack of consciousness of Confucian cultivation and for his impure Confucianism thought.The emergence of this phenomenon was inevitable out of the development of philosophical theories of scholars in the Song Dynasty(Song Xue),and a manifestation of the maturity of Neo Confucianism.

关 键 词：苏轼 黄庭坚 理学 宋学 文化现象 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]