诔与碑,铭,哀、吊及墓志文体辨析——以刘勰《文心雕龙》为基础  

Lei and tablet, inscription, mourning, hanging and epitaph stylistic analysis——Based on Liu Xie’s “Wen Xin Diao Long”

作　　者：佟子璇 Tong Zixuan(College of humanities,Wenzhou University,Wenzhou 325035,China)

机构地区：[1]温州大学人文学院,浙江温州325035

出　　处：《六盘水师范学院学报》2021年第4期49-57,共9页Journal of Liupanshui Normal University

摘　　要：碑、铭、哀、吊、墓志几种文体在文体特征、文体功用、语言风格等方面,皆与诔文存在共通性。然而,“诔”与“碑”、“诔”与“铭”、“诔”与“哀”“吊”、“诔”与墓志之间又分别存在着文章体例、施用对象、应用范围以及具体行文侧重点等方面的差异,且“诔”与其他几种文体的文辞风格亦不尽相同,故而“诔”并非等同于其他任一一种文体。而从刘勰《文心雕龙》文体论相关篇目的论述入手,对诔与碑、诔与铭、诔与哀吊、诔与墓志分别进行辨析,探讨诔与其相似文体间的联系与区别,能明晰文体界限,体现刘勰对文体分类的标准与思考,更全面深入地掌握诔文独特的文体特征。The stylistic features,stylistic functions, and language styles of monument, inscription, lament,eulogy, and epitaph all have commonalities with “Lei”. However, between “Lei” and “Bei”, “Lei” and“ming”, “Lei”and “Ai” “Diao”, “Lei” and epitaph, there are differences in article style, object of application,scope of application and emphasis of specific writing. Moreover, the text style of “Lei” is also different from that of other genres. For this reason, “Lei” is not equivalent to any other style. And starting with the discussion of the stylistic theory of Liu Xie’s “Wen Xin Diao Long”, there is an analysis to distinguish “Lei” from monument, inscription, lament and epitaph respectively, to explore the connection and difference between “Lei”and other similar literary texts, to clarify the boundaries, to reflect Liu Xie’s standards and thoughts on style classification, to have a more comprehensive and in-depth grasp of the unique style features of “Lei”.

关 键 词：诔 碑 铭 哀 吊 墓志 辨析 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]