财政分权对保障性住房供给效率的影响研究  

The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Urban Social Housing Provision Efficiency

作　　者：陈俊华 刘娜 Chen Junhua;Liu Na

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学投资系

出　　处：《财政研究》2021年第9期56-70,共15页Public Finance Research

基　　金：国家自然科学基金面上项目“中国城市住房不平等现象研究:成因机理、影响效应与政策应对”(编号:72074237)。

摘　　要：在"保基本、惠民生"背景下,研究保障性住房供给效率的现实意义凸显。本文首先从理论层面诠释财政分权与保障性住房供给效率的内在逻辑,然后基于2010—2019年的省级面板数据,实证考察财政分权对保障性住房供给的总效率、规模效率与纯技术效率的作用机制。研究发现,财政分权降低了保障性住房供给的总效率与纯技术效率,而对规模效率并无显著影响;相对于财政收入分权,财政支出分权程度的提升对纯技术效率的抑制作用更强。进一步分析发现,财政分权会提高地方政府对土地财政的依赖程度,进而降低保障性住房供给的总效率与纯技术效率;其次,财政分权对纯技术效率的负面效应随着效率值的提高而不断增强。本文的研究结论为提升保障性住房供给效率与完善住房保障体系提供了有益参考。This paper analyzes the relationship between fiscal decentralization and urban social housing provision efficiency from a theoretical level,and then based on the panel data of 31 provinces from 2010 to 2019,examines the impact of fiscal decentralization on the overall efficiency,scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency of urban social housing provision.The findings indicate that fiscal decentralization is negatively related to the overall efficiency and pure technical efficiency but has no impact on the scale efficiency.Moreover,the negative effect of fiscal expenditure decentralization is more evident than that of fiscal revenue decentralization.Further research proves that fiscal decentralization decreases the overall efficiency and pure technical efficiency by increasing the dependence of the local government on land finance.Furthermore,the negative impact of fiscal decentralization on pure technical efficiency is more obvious with the increase of pure technical efficiency.These results can serve as important references for the government to improve urban social housing provision efficiency and the housing security system.

关 键 词：财政分权 保障性住房供给 总效率 规模效率 纯技术效率 

分 类 号：F812.4[经济管理—财政学]