检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王飞 郑圣义[1] 朱小杰 WANG Fei;ZHENG Sheng-yi;ZHU Xiao-jie(College of Energy and Electrical Engineering,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China;Zhejiang Huakc Tongan Monitoring Technology Co,,Ltd,,Jiaxing 314500,China)
机构地区:[1]河海大学能源与电气学院,江苏南京210098 [2]浙江华科同安监控技术有限公司,浙江嘉兴314500
出 处:《水电能源科学》2021年第11期199-202,178,共5页Water Resources and Power
摘 要:准确评估水工钢闸门安全健康性状对闸门安全运行具有重要意义,针对目前大多数水工钢闸门安全评价过程具有明显主观性的问题,首先建立了水利工程钢闸门的安全健康评价指标体系,其次分别采用模糊层次分析法和熵权法确定25项评价指标的主、客观权重,再运用博弈组合优化思想来缩小两种权重之间的偏差,最后建立水工钢闸门的博弈TOPSIS安全健康评价模型对工程实例进行安全健康评价,并对比三种赋权方法的评价结果,结果表明基于博弈TOPSIS方法的评价结果准确,符合实际情况,具有较高的适用性。Accurate evaluation of hydraulic steel gate safety and health properties is of great significance to the safe operation of the gate.In view of the subjectivity of the present most of the hydraulic steel gate safety assessment process,this paper first established the evaluation index system of hydraulic steel gate safety and health.Secondly,the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process(FAHP)and entropy weight method were used to determine the subjective and objective weight of25 indexes,respectively.And then the game combinatorial optimization was used to reduce the deviation of the two weights.Finally,the gate TOPSIS safety and health evaluation model was established to evaluate the safety and health of engineering examples.Compared the three weight methods of evaluation results,it shows that the TOPSIS method based on the game is accurate,and the results conform to the actual situation,which has the higher applicability.
关 键 词:安全评价 水工钢闸门 模糊层次分析法 熵权法 博弈组合赋权
分 类 号:TV663[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15