检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田越 李辉 李红 TIAN Yue;LI Hui;LI Hong(Tuberculosis Department,Anshan Tuberculosis Hospital,Anshan 114000,China)
机构地区:[1]辽宁省鞍山市结核病医院结核内科,114000
出 处:《中国现代药物应用》2021年第18期118-121,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
摘 要:目的分析涂阳肺结核患者使用利福喷丁(RIF)与利福平(RMP)治疗的效果与安全性。方法89例涂阳肺结核患者,以抽签法分为A组(45例)与B组(44例)。A组予以LHZE(RIF+异烟肼+吡嗪酰胺+乙胺丁醇)治疗;B组予以RHZE(RMP+异烟肼+吡嗪酰胺+乙胺丁醇)治疗。比较两组病灶吸收效果、空洞闭合率、症状消退时间、不良反应发生率。结果A组的病灶吸收总有效率为97.78%,高于B组的84.09%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组的空洞闭合率为93.33%,高于B组的75.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组咳嗽消退时间(3.28±0.65)d、喘息消退时间(3.33±0.95)d、肺啰音消退时间(5.67±0.64)d短于B组的(5.24±0.81)、(5.98±1.05)、(6.99±0.81)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组不良反应发生率为4.44%,低于B组的18.18%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论涂阳肺结核患者进行RIF治疗的效果显著优于RMP,可促进症状消退,且安全效益好。Objective To analyze the effect and safety of rifapentine(RIF)and rifampin(RMP)in smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients.Methods A total of 89 patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis were divided into group A(45 cases)and group B(44 cases)according to lottery method.Group A was treated with LHZE(RIF+isoniazid+pyrazinamide+Ethambutol),and group B was treated with RHZE(RMP+isoniazid+pyrazinamide+Ethambutol).The effect of lesion absorption,cavity closure rate,symptom resolution time,and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of lesion absorption of group A was 97.78%,which was higher than 84.09%of group B,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The cavity closure rate in group A was 93.33%,which was higher than 75.00%in group B,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The cough resolution time(3.28±0.65)d,wheeze resolution time(3.33±0.95)d,and lung rale resolution time(5.67±0.64)d in group A were shorter than(5.24±0.81),(5.98±1.05)and(6.99±0.81)d of group B,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in group A was 4.44%,which was lower than 18.18%in group B,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Rif is more effective than RMP in treating smearpositive pulmonary tuberculosis patients.Rif can promote the resolution of symptoms and has good safety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.3.134