腐败的影响机制与作用方式——基于36个亚洲国家和地区的模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)  

Influence Mechanism and Action Mode of Corruption:A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis(fsQCA)Based on 36 Asian Countries and Regions

作　　者：徐国冲[1] 郭轩宇 XU Guochong;GUO Xuanyu(School of Public Affairs, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学公共事务学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第6期56-64,共9页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：厦门大学繁荣哲学社会科学资助项目(0220-Y07200);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关资助项目(18JZD047)。

摘　　要：腐败已成为当代国家不可忽视的治理难题。通过构建以经济、政治和社会因素为基础的腐败影响因素综合分析框架,运用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法探索各类因素的影响机制及其组合方式。研究发现:经济发展在不同阶段对腐败的作用方式不同;市场化程度和政府规模对腐败的影响均具有两面性,且二者之间联系密切;民主程度与媒体使用的同向增强有利于抑制腐败。同时,研究共归纳出四种腐败影响机制类型:市场自律型、政府主导型、发展落后型与发展失衡型,分别对应比较清廉的和比较腐败的国家,并呈现不同影响因素组合的作用方式。Corruption has become a governance problem that cannot be ignored in contemporary countries.By constructing a comprehensive analysis framework of corruption influencing factors based on economic,political and social factors,and using fsQCA(fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis)method to explore the influencing mechanism and combination of various factors,the research finds that economic development has different effects on corruption in different stages.The influence of marketization degree and government size on corruption has two sides,and they are closely related.Increasing the degree of democracy and the use of media at the same time can help curb corruption.The study also summarizes four types of corruption influencing mechanisms,i.e.market self-discipline,government-led,backward development and unbalanced development,which correspond to relatively clean and relatively corrupt countries respectively,and reflect the action modes of different influencing factor combinations.

关 键 词：腐败 经济发展水平 政府规模 市场化程度 民主程度 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]