公共科技服务的网络治理模式:基于多重制度逻辑的研究  

Research on the Network Governance Patterns of S&T Services Based on the Perspective of Multiple Institutional Logic

作　　者：邱国栋[1] 林长崟 QIU Guodong;LIN Changyin(School of Business Administration,Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian 116025,China)

机构地区：[1]东北财经大学工商管理学院,辽宁大连116025

出　　处：《中国软科学》2021年第10期53-64,共12页China Soft Science

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目"创新驱动战略背景下风投规制化与系统环境构建研究"(19ZDA099)。

摘　　要：围绕"公共科技服务网络治理模式"的核心问题,本文引入多重制度逻辑及竞争性互动的视角,通过对北京平台、上海平台、江苏平台和浙江平台的案例研究,揭示了公共科技服务的网络治理模式的内在机理。研究发现,不同主体对公共科技服务的价值目标及实现价值目标的实践认识存在显著差异,认识差异源于公益逻辑、市场逻辑和职业逻辑。多重制度逻辑之间的竞争性互动体现在公共科技服务平台的核心目标、管辖权重叠、治理机制协同3个方面,本文识别了地方政府强制融合、模块分化、中介耦合和组织锚定4种应对方式,应对方式选择源于政府偏好和资源身份两个情境因素。Through multiple-case study of Public S&T Platform in beijing, shagnhai, jiangsu and zhejiang, this article reveals how the network governancePatternsof Public S&T Science respond to the challenge of Institutional Complexity caused by competitive interaction between multiple Institutional Logic. This article is show that:(1) Universities, Research Institutions, State-Owned Enterprises and Intermediary organizations have significant differences in the understanding of the value goal and practical activity of Public S&T Platform, which are mainly classified into welfare logic, market logic and professional logic.(2) The competitive interaction between multiple Institutional logics is reflected in three aspects: the core value goal of the platform, jurisdictional right conflicts, coordination of governance mechanism.(3) Four coping styles of local government are identified, forced integration, structural differentiation, intermediary coupling and Anchored tissue.(4) This paper studies the relevance between regional context and the choice of platform organizational form, Local Government preference and resource identity is the mainly influence factor for heterogeneous platforms.

关 键 词：多重制度逻辑 网络治理 公共科技服务 案例研究 

分 类 号：G311[文化科学]