检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王铮 Wang Zheng(School of Public Administration and Policy,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)
出 处:《甘肃行政学院学报》2021年第4期4-15,123,共13页Journal of Gansu Administration Institute
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“中国改革开放创造的治理经验及政府理论提升”(19ZDA125);国家自然科学基金面上项目“网络抱怨群体的用户画像及其在复杂社会治理中的运用”(71974216);中国人民大学中央高校建设世界一流大学(学科)和特色发展引导专项资金。
摘 要:社会动员是中国国家能力的重要组成部分,也是理解国家治理的关键切口。传统社会动员模式建立在高度同质化的社会结构基础上,并以此实现国家意志的基层执行。随着权威认同的弱化、社会的原子化和代表性断裂,传统的动员模式在应对复杂社会治理中逐渐式微。作为新时代场景转换中的基层社会动员模式,“党建动员社会”借助党组织的差异化权威塑造、党组织统筹的项目化运作、党组织社区能人吸纳三重机制,分别构建了社会动员的合法性来源、组织基础和技术支撑,从而回应复杂化社会治理。“党建动员社会”的特质在于,一方面,其延续了中国以社会动员的方式来推行政策、贯彻国家意志的传统,另一方面,新模式发展出通过体制力量的扩张来孕育社会,并以此回应和解决复杂治理问题的新机制,从而蕴含着党与社会相互促进的理论可能。未来改革的方向在于,以更系统的治理思维,通过及时、清晰和富有韧性的制度调适,平衡社会动员和制度化之间的内在张力并规范其作用边界。Social mobilization is an important part of China's national capabilities and a key dimension in understanding national governance.Traditional social mobilization is based on a highly homogeneous social structure,which promotes the grassroots implementation of national will.With the weakening of authority identity,the atomization and representative fracture of society,the traditional mobilization mode has gradually declined in dealing with complex social governance.As a grass-roots social mobilization model in the context transformation of the new era,"Party Building Mobilization Society"constructs the legitimacy source,organizational basis and technical support of social mobilization by means of three mechanisms:differentiated authority shaping of Party organizations,project-based operation of Party organization integration and community elite absorption of Party organizations,so as to respond to govern complex societies.The characteristic of"Party building mobilizing society"is that,on the one hand,it continues China's tradition of implementing policies and national will by means of social mobilization,but at the same time,the new model has developed a new mechanism to nurture society through the expansion of institutional forces,so as to respond to and solve various governance problems,and establishes the interest relationship between party claims and social needs by social mobilization,which contains the theoretical possibility of mutual promotion between party and social relations.The direction of future reform is to balance the internal tension between social mobilization and institutionalization and regulate its boundary of action through more systematic governance thinking and timely,clear and resilient institutional adjustment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249