检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许幸丽 王艳华[1] XU Xing-li;WANG Yan-hua(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出 处:《哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报》2021年第5期25-29,共5页Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University
摘 要:随着大数据与人工智能的浪潮席卷全球,人工智能技术迅猛发展,手术机器人被广泛应用于医疗领域。手术机器人具有提高手术精确性、安全性、创新诊疗模式、减少医生繁杂工作量等技术价值与社会价值。但其最大的问题是手术机器人技术安全漏洞产生的医疗损害所引发的责任承担难题。当手术机器人不再被简单的认为是人类工具的延伸时,传统医疗损害责任归责体系难以适应,需要亟待完善责任规则,明确手术机器人是否具有法律主体资格,确定其产品属性、责任主体范围,在归责原则方面以无过错责任原则来认定责任,以实现科技创新和权利保护间的平衡。With the boom of big data and artificial intelligence sweeping the world and the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology,surgical robot has been widely used in the medical field.Surgical robot has the technical and social value of improving the accuracy and safety of surgery,innovating the diagnosis and treatment mode,and reducing the complicated workload of doctors.But the biggest problem is the liability for the medical damage caused by the security loopholes of surgical robotics.When surgical robots are no longer the simple thought is the extension of human instrument,traditional medical damage liability imputation system is difficult to adapt to,liability rules,it is necessary to reform the need to clear whether surgery robot has legal subject qualification,determine its product attributes,scope of responsibility main body,in terms of imputation principle to no-fault liability principle to identify responsibility,To strike a balance between technological innovation and rights protection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30