清代《尚书》学“伏郑之争”考察  

Study on the Dispute of Fuh-sheng and Zheng Xuan of Shang-shu Research

作　　者：侯金满 HOU Jin-man

机构地区：[1]清华大学历史系

出　　处：《北京社会科学》2021年第11期60-70,共11页Social Sciences of Beijing

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(14ZDB009)——《仪礼》复原与当代日常礼仪重建研究。

摘　　要：在清代“汉学”兴起过程中,汉代的伏生与郑玄两家《尚书》经说重新受到重视,先后形成了以“宗郑”为代表的古文经学一派和以“师伏”为代表的今文经学一派,两派之间发生了多次交锋,可称之为清代《尚书》学中的“伏郑之争”。“伏郑之争”涵盖了《尚书》学的文献层面、经说层面及相关经说史料的性质归属层面等,其产生原因与清代经学重视师法家法的整体风气及今古文经学背景下学术风尚、学术背景改变密切相关。清代《尚书》学“伏郑之争”不是两汉“今古文之争”的历史重现,而是清代学者在新的知识背景及历史语境下对两汉《尚书》学的阐释与重塑,其背后牵涉到的学术背景、政治环境与现实诉求都与汉代迥然不同。Fuh Sheng and Zheng Xuan are two great masters on the study of confucian classics in the Han dynasty.In the rise of Han school of text studies in the Qing dynasty,Fuh Sheng and zheng xuan were figured prominently again.The scholars prefered to Old Text asserted to“follow Zheng Xuan”,in contrast,the scholars prefered to New Text asserted to“imitated Fuh Sheng”.Thus there were several debates between the two sides,so was the debates between Fuh Sheng and Zheng Xuan in the Shangshu reserch in Qing Dynasty.The debates between the two sides included the discussion on the text level,the theory level and the nature of the attribution level of the related historical materials.The reasosn of the debates are closely related to the overall atmosphere of the Qing Dynasty Confucian classics study that attaches importance to the coaching and family discipline and the change of academic fashion and background.The debates between the two sides in the Study of Shangshu in the Qing Dynasty were not the historical reappearance of the debates between New Text and Old Text in the Han Dynasty,but the interpretation and remodeling of the study of Shangshu in the Qing Dynasty under the new knowledge background and historical context.The academic background,political environment and realistic demands were completely different from those in the Han Dynasty.

关 键 词：今古文之争 伏生 郑玄 《尚书》学 清代汉学 

分 类 号：K249[历史地理—历史学]