生态修复制度之现实隐忧与规范精进  

Realistic Worries and Legal Improvement of Ecological Restoration System

作　　者：高思洋[1] GAO Siyang(Manzhouli College, Inner Mongolia University, Manzhouli, Inner Mongolia 021400, China)

机构地区：[1]内蒙古大学满洲里学院,内蒙古满洲里021400

出　　处：《中国石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第5期83-91,共9页Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)

基　　金：内蒙古自治区高等学校科学研究项目(NJSY18355)。

摘　　要：近年来生态修复制度的讨论较为激烈,在环境法、民法中均有所涉猎。但针对该项制度概念设置混乱的局面,采用法律解释的路径治标不治本,重置生态修复概念才是解决问题的上策。生态修复制度在回归本体研究中,突破自身强制保障系统的窠臼,构筑以生态修复为中心的环境追责机制对明确环境责任的独立价值十分必要。针对司法实践在损失认定与恢复评估中的困境,提出矫正“一单定损”的方法和设立生态修复评估规则的建议,以有效推进生态修复最优价值的实现。In recent years,ecological restoration system has been a hot topic both in environmental law and civil law.The path of legal interpretation in view of the chaotic setting of this concept is a band-aid and does not address the root cause.Resetting the concept of ecological restoration is the best way to solve the problem.While returning to the ontological research of ecological restoration system,breaking through its own limitations of compulsory guarantee system and building an environmental accountability mechanism centered on ecological restoration are very necessary for clarifying the independent value of environmental responsibility.With regard to the dilemma of judicial practice in loss identification and restoration assessment,we put forward the method of correcting the"one order damage"and the establishment of ecological restoration evaluation rules so as to effectively promote the realization of the optimal value of ecological restoration.

关 键 词：生态修复 环境责任 损失认定 恢复评估 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]