环境风险的规制模式--规范主义、功能主义抑或综合模式  

Research on the Model of Environmental Risk Regulation——Normalism,Functionalism or the Combination of Two

作　　者：朱志权 邓可祝[3] ZHU Zhi-quan;DENG Ke-zhu

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,江西抚州344000 [2]东华理工大学文法学院 [3]安徽工业大学公共管理与法学院,安徽马鞍山243002

出　　处：《中国地质大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第6期26-37,共12页Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学项目“民主商谈原则在我国核能开发中的应用研究”(15YJA820042);国家社会科学基金项目“风险规制视域下预防性环境公益诉讼研究”(20BFX168)。

摘　　要：规制风险是现代环境法的重要使命,我国已经基本形成了规制环境风险的法律体系,但还存在较多问题。环境风险规制的实现路径存在规范主义与功能主义模式之分。规范主义重视环境风险规制的形式合法性,要求环境风险规制在立法、行政、司法方面的体系化;功能主义重视环境风险规制的弹性与适应性,要求通过多种方式来制约环境行政裁量权。我国目前的环境风险规制,应兼收不同模式的价值,重视功能主义所具有的风险吸纳、行政自制功能,从而更好地强化环境风险规制的有效性,促进环境风险的良性治理。Risk Regulation is an important mission of modern environmental law.China has made a legal system to regulate environmental risks,but there are still many problems.Normalism and functionalism are two different models to realize environmental risks regulation.Normalism attaches importance to the formal legitimacy of environmental risk regulation and requires the systematization of environmental risk regulation in the legislative,administrative,and judicial aspects;while functionalism attaches importance to the flexibility and applicability of environmental risk regulation and requires multiple ways to restrict environmental administrative discretion.China should pay attention to the value of different models,especially the risk absorption function and administrative self-control function of functionalism,so as to strengthen the effectiveness of environmental risk regulation,and promote the benign governance of environmental risks.

关 键 词：环境风险规制 规范主义 功能主义 

分 类 号：D912.601[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]