“框子”和语言对柯尔律治“同一生命”的消解  

Deconstruction of “One Life” by Passe-partouts and Spell of Language

作　　者：王榕 WANG Rong

机构地区：[1]四川外国语大学英语学院,重庆400031

出　　处：《外国语文》2021年第5期56-62,共7页Foreign Languages and Literature

基　　金：重庆市教委研究生创新项目“‘时代精神’与玛丽·沃斯通克拉夫特研究”(CYB17135)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：柯尔律治的文学与哲学理论以对"同一生命"的追求为旨归,也被称为"两极相遇",旨在调和处于对立位置的两极,是对二元对立哲学传统的继承与发展。康德有过类似的哲学尝试,他试图以《判断力批判》弥合《纯粹理性批判》和《实践理性批判》所代表的超感精神与可感自然之间的鸿沟。但是德里达在《绘画的真理》中通过分析审美活动这一不断设立框子又不断摧毁框子的行为体现出的理论预设与实际操作之间的矛盾,即其试图超越认识论、但实际仍未跳脱认识论系统的内在矛盾,解构康德的哲学尝试。受这种解构行为的启发,本文通过探索柯尔律治作品中以"墓碑"和"死中生"为代表的模糊生死界限的框子式意象,发现框子式的存在物削弱了"两极相遇"的基础,即处于对立关系的两极,"同一生命"的达成只是人通过语言媒介与自身心灵的和解。The purport of Coleridge’s literary and philosophical theory is to search for "one life", which is also called to make extremes meet. Its purpose is to reconciliate the two polarities, which shows Coleridge’s inheriting and development of dualism. Kant has made the similar philosophical attempt. He tries to bridge the chasm between the Critique of Pure Reason and Critique of Practical Reason by Critique of Judgement, which means Kant tries to bridge the chasm between the suprasensible and the sensible by aesthetics. But in The Truth in Painting, Derrida finds Kant’s philosophical endeavor is comprised by a series of behaviors of setting up and erasing the frame, that is to say, the aesthetic judgement tries to step out of the logical judgements but never succeeds, which is the contradiction between theoretical presupposition and actual operation. This research notes that there are also some "passe-partouts" in Coleridge’s poems represented by "gravestone" and "Life-in-Death", whose existence weakens the opposition between two poles and dents the foundation for two extremes to meet. As a result, "one life" can only be achieved by man within his own mind by language.

关 键 词：柯尔律治 同一生命 框子 语言 

分 类 号：I561.09[文学—其他各国文学]