检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈洁[1] CHEN Jie(Institute of law,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100088)
出 处:《现代法学》2021年第5期145-157,共13页Modern Law Science
摘 要:“利用自身信息交易”是指利用自己的信息对并非自己发行的金融工具实施交易的情形。成熟市场通过不同的监管路径构建了利用自身信息实施交易免受内幕交易责任规制的抗辩规则。我国现行《证券法》除沿袭旧法对收购情形下利用自身信息实施交易予以内幕交易责任豁免外,对内幕交易安全港规则尚无内在统一的立法思路。本文以自身交易信息作为切入点,考察不同内幕交易监管理念下“利用自身信息交易”作为内幕交易抗辩规则之结构性差异,厘清利用自身信息实施交易应当免于承担内幕交易责任的内在逻辑,进而为我国规制内幕交易制度的完善,尤其是内幕交易安全港规则的构建提供框架性建议。“Trading with one’s own information”refers to the trading of financial instruments not issued by one’s own with one’s own information.Mature markets have constructed defense rules to avoid insider trading regulation application by using their own information through different regulatory paths.China’s current Securities Law follows the previous law and exempts the liability of insider trading by using one’s own information in the case of acquisition,which has no unified legislative approach for the safe harbor rule of insider trading.This paper takes one’s own trading information as the lead,investigating the regulatory path differences of trading with one’s own information under different insider trading regulatory philosophy,and clarifying the internal logic that trading with one’s own information should be exempted from insider trading accountability,so as to provide framework suggestions for the improvement of China’s insider trading regulatory system,especially the construction of safe harbor rules of insider trading.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.217.16