检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚建宗[1] 何永祥 Yao Jianzong;He Yongxiang
机构地区:[1]吉林大学法学院,长春130015
出 处:《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2021年第6期141-151,共11页Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
摘 要:关注惩罚及其正当性的学者们对“惩罚是什么”问题所给出的答案不外乎是以“痛苦”或“伤害”为基础构建起来的定义。然而,痛苦并不适合拿来解释惩罚,这是因为其作为一种内在的感觉体验,不仅会引发严重的理论困惑,而且无法与所公认的惩罚要素相结合。而伤害作为一种客观的实在和行动,不仅能够解决痛苦所引发的问题,而且也与“惩罚”的日常用法一致。Scholars who focus on punishment and its justification have defined“punishment”in its relation to either the pain it causes to or the harm it inflicts on those being punished.However,pain is not a suitable explanation for punishment,because as an internal sensory experience,it not only causes serious theoretical confusion,but also fails to integrate with the accepted elements of punishment.Harm,as an objective reality and as an action,can not only solve the problems caused by pain,but is also consistent with the daily use of“punishment”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.140.129