人格权请求权基础的规范分析——基于《民法典》人格权编的规范表达  

A Normative Analysis of the Basis of the Personality Right Claim--Based on the Compilation of Personality Rights in the Civil Code

作　　者：董文 Dong Wen(Law School, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]山东财经大学法学院,济南250014

出　　处：《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第6期86-93,共8页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：中国法学会民法学研究会青年学者研究项目“强人工智能体大规模侵权救济研究”(2020MFXH011);山东省社会科学规划审判研究专项“‘平安山东’视域下的医药品不良反应致害之行民交叉规制研究”(19CSPJ01)。

摘　　要：人格权独立成编是民法典的一大特色,而在人格权编中,既有着大量的人格权益确认规范,又兼及众多的人格权请求权规范。尽管均能救济人格权益,侵权请求权基础的规范构造已然较为清晰,但是人格权请求权基础仍存在相当的模糊地带。因而,有必要开展人格权请求权基础的规范分析,针对传统的违法构成说与“新晋”的动态系统论,探究人格权请求权基础的应有构造。同时,基于人格权请求权与侵权请求权规范功能的关联性,亦需以体系化视角厘定两种请求权的规范边界,使两种请求权依其殊异的规范结构,共同妥帖而周全地保护民事主体的人格权益。The independent compilation of personality rights is a major feature of the Civil Code.In the compilation of personality rights,there are not only a large number of norms for the confirmation of personality rights and interests,but also numerous norms for the claim of personality rights.Although both can relieve the legal interests of personality,the normative structure of the basis of tort claims has been relatively clear,there are still quite ambiguous areas in the basis of the personality rights claim.Therefore,it is necessary to carry out a normative analysis of the basis of the claim of personality rights,and to explore the proper structure of it according to the traditional illegal constitution theory and the new dynamic system theory.In addition,based on the relevance towards the normative functions of the claim of personality rights and tort claim,it is also necessary to determine the normative boundary of the two types of claims from a systematic perspective,so that the two types of claims can be used to protect the personal legal interests of civil subjects in accordance with their different normative structures.

关 键 词：民法典 人格权请求权 侵权请求权 违法性 动态系统论 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]