检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨锋[1] 陈登辉 焦传亚 YANG Feng;CHEN Deng-hui;JIAO Chuan-ya(School of Management,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230026,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学技术大学管理学院,安徽合肥230026
出 处:《运筹与管理》2021年第10期18-22,共5页Operations Research and Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71991464,71631006)。
摘 要:研究了不同博弈模型下制造商产品策略的问题,建立并求解制造商在古诺博弈和斯坦伯格博弈下的模型。通过逆推法求解最优决策,进一步给出了两种博弈模型下的均衡解,并将结果加以对比,得出两种博弈模型对供应商的批发价格和利润、制造商的产品质量和利润的影响。研究表明:供应商的批发价格与博弈模型无关,只和市场规模有关;供应商的利润、制造商的产品质量和利润不仅与博弈模型相关还与制造商的技术创新水平有关。This paper investigates manufacturers’product strategies under different game models.Two game models marked Cournot game and Stackelberg game are developed and solved.Besides,an inverse method for solving the optimal decision is constructed,the method for solving the equilibrium in the two game models is given,and the results of the two game models are compared.We explore the influence of two game models on the wholesale price,profit of supplier,the product quality and profit of manufacturers.It is found that the wholesale price of supplier has nothing to do with the game models,only with the market size.It is also found that the profit of supplier as well as the product quality and profit of manufacturers are related not only to game models but also to the technology innovation capability of manufacturers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.175.173