检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨雪龙 杜岩功[2] 石丽娜 谢芹芹 赵旭东 YANG Xue-long;DU Yan-gong;SHI Li-na;XIE Qin-qin;ZHAO Xu-dong(Environment Protection Monitor Center of Haibei in Qinghai Province,Haiyan 812200,China;Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology,Chinese Academy of Science,Xining 810008,China;Qinghai Guangu Ecological Environment Science Research Company,Xining 810001,China)
机构地区:[1]青海省海北州生态环境监测站,青海海晏县812200 [2]中国科学院西北高原生物研究所,青海西宁市810008 [3]青海观谷生态环境科学研究有限公司,青海西宁市810001
出 处:《草原与草坪》2021年第5期125-130,共6页Grassland and Turf
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(31770532);中科院西部之光西部青年学者项目。
摘 要:基于Meta分析,通过对中国北方草地已开展的24个有关不同放牧强度对土壤pH影响的试验结果进行整合分析。结果表明:放牧轻度增加我国北方草地土壤pH值,平均效应值为0.009±0.006,增幅0.91%。放牧极显著增加温性草甸草原土壤pH值(P<0.01),但降低高寒草甸土壤pH值。不同放牧强度对pH平均效应值的影响无显著性差异,从高到低为轻度放牧>重度放牧>中度放牧。土壤全磷对放牧草地平均效应值具有显著负效应(P<0.05),可以解释14.56%的效应值变异。土壤速效氮、速效磷、有机质、全钾和容重也是解释效应值变异的主要因素。放牧利用对北方草地土壤pH不会产生较大影响,中度放牧利用为最适宜的草地利用方式。The grasslands in northern China are important ecological security barriers.Soil pH directly affects soil microbial activity and the form of carbon and nitrogen nutrient.Previous studies have paid little attention to the effects of grazing disturbance on soil pH and its driving factors.A meta-analysis based on the data from 24 experiments was undertaken to study the effects of different grazing intensities on soil pH.Our results showed that grazing disturbance slightly increased soil pH of grassland(by 0.91%),with an average effect size of 0.009±0.006.Grazing significantly increased soil pH of temperate meadow steppe(P<0.01),but decreased effect size of alpine meadow.There was no significant difference in the average effect sizes among the different grazing intensities,following an order of light grazing>heavy grazing>moderate grazing.Soil total phosphorus had a significant and negative correlation with the average effect size of grassland soil pH(P<0.05),which could explain 14.56%variation.Soil available nitrogen,available phosphorus,organic matter,total potassium and bulk density were all main factors to explain the variation of response value.Grazing did not have significant effects on soil pH,and moderate grazing was the most suitable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7