奖项激励多维影响的双机制识别——来自中国电影奖项的证据  

Identifying the Dual Mechanisms in Multi-Dimensional Award Incentives:Evidence from China’s Movie Awards

作　　者：杨子砚 陈靓 YANG Ziyan;CHEN Jing(Xiamen University,Xiamen,361005;Fudan University,Shanghai,200433)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学经济学院经济学系与邹至庄经济研究中心 [2]复旦大学经济学院

出　　处：《中国经济问题》2021年第5期89-106,共18页China Economic Studies

基　　金：自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(No.71803164、No.71803165)的资助。

摘　　要：奖项激励相关文献存在视角局限、维度单一和机制识别不清三大问题,本文依据2001-2018年间中国大众电影百花奖的评奖情况,运用双重差分法,区分和识别了市场选择机制和自身选择机制下奖项对获奖者后续工作数量、质量和多元化发展的多维激励作用。第一,奖项激励未能对获奖者的后续工作数量、质量产生显著影响。其中,市场选择机制抑制了男性获奖者对高产、高质的发展意愿;两种激励机制对女性获奖者均不显著。第二,两种机制都鼓励获奖者的多元化发展,但市场选择机制抑制了较年轻获奖者多元化发展的意愿,却为较年长获奖者提供多元化发展的机会。Existing literature on award incentives has three problems:limited research perspectives,single-dimension studies,and unclearly identified mechanisms.Using the data on the Hundred Flowers Awards’nominators from 2001 to 2018,in a difference-in-difference framework,we identify and distinguish the multi-dimensional impacts of awards on winners’subsequent productivity,working quality,and working-task diversity under the mechanisms associated with market selections and individual selection.First,we show that the awards have no impacts on winners’subsequent productivity and working quality.For male winners,the market selection mechanism denies male winners’individual pursue of high-productivity and high-quality development willingness;for female winners,none of the two mechanisms function well.Second,award incentives significantly affect winners’working-task diversity.Both mechanisms support the winners to expand their working-task diversity.However,the market selection mechanism denies junior winners’individual pursue of working-task diversity,while providing diverse working tasks to senior winners.

关 键 词：奖项激励 电影产业 豆瓣评分 多元化发展 

分 类 号：J943[艺术—电影电视艺术]