检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Xuchao ZHU Yin LIANG Zhiyuan TIAN Yi ZHANG Yugang ZHANG Jing DU Xin WANG Yu LI Lili QU Mengmeng DAI
机构地区:[1]State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture,Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nanjing 210008(China) [2]Taihu Basin Monitoring Central Station for Soil and Water Conservation,Taihu Basin Authority of Ministry of Water Resources,Shanghai 200434(China) [3]College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190(China)
出 处:《Pedosphere》2021年第5期715-724,共10页土壤圈(英文版)
基 金:financially supported by the Taihu Basin Authority of Ministry of Water Resources;China(No.SYST-2019-013);the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province;China(No.BK20181109);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41807019);the Jiangsu Science and Technology Department(No.2019039);the Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring Station of Jiangsu Province;China(No.JSSW201911005);the National Key Research and Development Program of China(No.2018YFC1801801)。
摘 要:Soil erodibility(K)is a key factor of soil erosion,and its appropriate quantification and interpolation are vitally important for soil and water conservation.The traditional point-represent-polygon approaches and common kriging method for the estimation of K,however,do not sufficiently represent the original data.The objectives of this study were to simulate the spatial distribution of K using a sequential Gaussian algorithm and analyze the uncertainty in evaluating the risk of soil erodibility in southeastern China.We determined 101 sampling points in the area and collected disturbed soil samples from the 0-20 cm layer at each point.Soil properties were determined,and K was calculated using five common models:the EPIC(Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator),approximate nomograph,Torri,Shirazi,and Wang models.Among the chosen models,the EPIC model performed the best at estimating K(KEPIC),which ranged from 0.019 to 0.060 t ha h(ha MJ mm)^(-1),with a mean of 0.043 t ha h(ha MJ mm)^(-1).The KEPIC was moderately spatially variable and had a limited spatial structure,increasing from south to north in our study area,and all spatial simulations using the cooperative kriging(CK)interpolation and the sequential Gaussian simulation(SGS)with 10,25,50,100,200,and 500 realizations had acceptable accuracies.The CK interpolation narrowed the range,and the SGS maintained the original characteristics of the calculated data.The proportions of the risk area were 38.0% and 10.1%,when the risk probability for K was 60% and 80%,respectively,and high risk areas were mostly located in the north.The results provide scientific guidance for managing the risk of soil erodibility in southeastern China.
关 键 词:geostatistical analysis K models kriging interpolation risk assessment soil erosion spatial simulation
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.95