中国科技查新服务评价研究述评  

Review of the Evaluation of Scientific and Technical Novelty Search Service in China

作　　者：夏冬[1] 徐英祺 王超[2,3] 李蓓 XIA Dong;XU Yingqi;WANG Chao;LI Bei(Chengdu Library and Information Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Chengdu 610000;Qilu University of Technology(Shandong Academy of Sciences),Jinan 250014;Institute of Information Research,Shandong Academy of Sciences,Jinan 250014;Department of Bio-information,School of Life Sciences,Central South University,Changsha 410000)

机构地区：[1]中国科学院成都文献情报中心,成都610000 [2]齐鲁工业大学(山东省科学院),济南250000 [3]山东省科学院情报研究所,济南250000 [4]中南大学生命科学学院,长沙410000

出　　处：《农业图书情报学报》2021年第11期16-27,共12页Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture

基　　金：四川省省级科技计划项目“基于PP-SFA和SDEM模型的四川省五大经济区创新协作发展研究”(2020JDR0011);中国科学院成都文献情报中心主任基金青年项目“网络环境下的科技查新机构服务质量评价模型构建研究”(Y9Z0010407)。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]针对中国科技查新服务评价的现状及特点进行研究,并提出中国科技查新服务评价的建议。[方法/过程]基于科技查新服务体系的视角,采用内容分析法,选取评价主客体、评价指标体系、评价方法及实证研究5方面,分析当前国内科技查新服务评价研究现状和存在的问题。[结果/结论]中国科技查新服务评价存在评价客体概念混淆、缺乏定量评价指标体系标准、忽视服务效能评价、未探讨评价后科技查新发展问题的问题,并提出厘清概念及其内涵边界,建立顶层指标体系标准,推行内外二元评价机制,契合需求注重细化发展的对策。[Purpose/Significance]This paper aims at discussing the current situation and characteristics of the scientific and technical novelty search evaluation,and putting forward suggestions for the research.[Method/Process]We analyze the research status and problems of the domestic scientific and technical novelty search evaluation from the aspects of evaluation subject and object,evaluation index system,evaluation methods,and empirical research through the literature content analysis method.[Results/Conclusions]It is found that there are some problems in the evaluation of scientific and technical novelty search in China,such as fuzzy and confused evaluation objects,a lack of quantitative evaluation indicator system and standard,,neglect of evaluation of the service efficiency,and a lack of discussion of the development of scientific and technical search after evaluation.Finally,some suggestions for future research are put forward,such as clarifying the evaluation object and its concept boundary,designing the top-level index system guided by efficiency,implementing the internal and external dual evaluation mechanism,and meeting the needs and focusing on detailed development.

关 键 词：科技查新 评价 学科服务 

分 类 号：G254[文化科学—图书馆学]