Altmetrics评价视域下社会化阅读平台图书评分数据可用性研究--以豆瓣读书为例  

Data Usability of Book Rating Scores on Social Reading Platform from the Perspective of Altmetrics Evaluation:A Case Study of Douban Reading

作　　者：兰雪 韩毅[1] LAN Xue;HAN Yi(College of Computer and Information Science,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715)

机构地区：[1]西南大学计算机与信息科学学院,重庆400715

出　　处：《农业图书情报学报》2021年第11期74-82,共9页Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture

基　　金：四川省社会科学规划重大课题“中文图书Altmetrics评价及其在四川哲学社会科学学科影响力分析中的应用”(SC17EZD035)。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]通过分析图书被引用次数与豆瓣读书平台图书评分之间的相关性,探究社会化阅读平台图书评分数据作为学术图书Altmetrics评价指标数据的可用性。[方法/过程]分别获取各大类图书被引用次数与豆瓣评分数据,通过皮尔逊相关分析和斯皮尔曼相关分析,比较不同大类图书被引用次数与豆瓣评分之间的相关系数,揭示社会化阅读平台图书评分数据作为Altmetrics评价数据的可用性。[结果/结论]社会化阅读平台图书评分数据具有一定的Altmetrics评价可用性,不同大类图书的社会化阅读平台图书评分数据可用性存在差异。[Purpose/Significance]Analyzing the correlation between book citations and book rating score on Douban reading platform,this paper explores the usability of book rating data on social reading platform as Altmetrics eval uation indicators for academic books.[Method/Process]The citation number and Douban rating data of each category books were obtained respectively.The coefficient of Pearson correlation and Spearman correlation were calculated,and the correlation coefficient between the citations of different categories books and the Douban rating score was used to reveal the usability of the rating data of books on the social reading platforms as Altmetrics evaluation data.[Results/Conclusions]There is a certain degree of usability for Altmetrics evaluation in the scores of books on social reading platforms,but there are differences in the usability of the scores of books of different categories on social reading platforms.

关 键 词：社会化阅读平台 豆瓣 图书评价 Altmetrics 数据可用性 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]