检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董平 DONG Ping(China University of Political Science and Law,100088,Beijing,China)
出 处:《特区经济》2021年第10期113-116,共4页Special Zone Economy
摘 要:本文从利润分配方案的本质为公司意思自治的角度出发,提出其不仅可能存在于公司决议,还可能存在于公司章程或者股东协议,只有在三者均不存在利润分配方案时,股东才有必要基于抽象利润分配请求权寻求司法救济。具体而言,本文将论证公司决议、公司章程或者股东协议能够作为利润分配的依据,并列举股东需要基于抽象利润分配请求权诉请司法救济的具体情形。From the perspective that the nature of proposals of the distribution of profits is the autonomy of will of the corporation,this article puts forward that proposals may not only exist in corporate decisions,but also may exist in corporation bylaws or shareholders’agreements.Only if there is no proposal of the distribution of profits in any of them,is it necessary for the shareholders to seek for judicial remedies on the basis of the rights to request declaration of dividends.Specifically,this article will demonstrate that the corporate decisions,corporation bylaws or shareholders’agreements can be the basis of distribution of profits,and will enumerate the specific circumstances where shareholders have to file a suit for judicial remedies on the basis of the rights to request declaration of dividends.
关 键 词:利润分配请求权 利润分配方案 司法救济 适用依据
分 类 号:D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.226.170