国内外排水管道状况评估系统对比分析研究  

Comparative Analysis of Pipelines Condition Assessment Protocols at Home and Abroad

作　　者：杜预 郭帅 潘刚[2] 吕耀志 DU Yu;GUO Shuai;PAN Gang;Lü Yao-zhi(College of Civil Engineering,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China;College of Intelligence and Computing,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300350,China;Tianjin Municipal Engineering Design&Research Institute Co.Ltd.,Tianjin 300051,China)

机构地区：[1]合肥工业大学土木与水利工程学院,安徽合肥230009 [2]天津大学智能与计算学部,天津300350 [3]天津市政工程设计研究总院有限公司,天津300051

出　　处：《中国给水排水》2021年第20期9-15,共7页China Water & Wastewater

基　　金：安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(1908085QE211)。

摘　　要：根据英国的《排水管道状况分类手册》(第四版,SRM-4)、美国的《管道评估与认证程序》(PACP)、加拿大的《下水道物理条件分类手册》(SPCCM)和中国的《城镇排水管道检测与评估技术规程》(CJJ 181—2012),对四国的排水管道状况评估系统的缺陷定义内容、缺陷代码编制方法和评估过程进行对比研究。结果表明,造成缺陷定义差异的主要原因有适用地区的不同、管道修复技术的差异、缺陷研究的进展及结构性和功能性缺陷的定义不同。造成评估结果差异的主要原因是缺陷分数赋予和评估参数选取的不同。Comparative studies were conducted on four different protocols in this work,including the fourth edition of Sewer Rehabilitation Manual(SRM-4)in Britain,Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program(PACP)in America,Sewer Physical Condition Classification Manual(SPCCM)in Canada and Technical Specification for Inspection and Evaluation of Urban Sewer(CJJ 181-2012)in China,which aim to find out their differences in defects definitions,the characteristics of defect code compilation and the assessment processes.Major reasons for the different assessment results from each protocol have been revealed.The results show that the main reasons for the differences on the defect definitions are different application areas,different pipeline repair technologies,new progress in pipeline defect research and different definitions of structural defects and functional defects.The main reason for the difference of assessment results is the difference of defect scores and assessment parameters.

关 键 词：排水管道 状况评估 对比分析 缺陷 

分 类 号：TU992[建筑科学—市政工程]