环境规制、创新能级与经济增长质量  

Environmental Regulation, Innovation Level and Quality of Economic Growth

作　　者：马卫东[1,2] 唐德善 史修松[3] Ma Weidong;Tang Deshan;Shi Xiusong(Business School,Suqian University,Suqian Jiangsu 223800,China;Business School,Hohai University,Nanjing 211100,China;Subei Development Research Institute,Huaiyin Institute of Technology,Huaian Jiangsu 223003,China)

机构地区：[1]宿迁学院商学院,江苏宿迁223800 [2]河海大学商学院,南京211100 [3]淮阴工学院苏北发展研究院,江苏淮安223003

出　　处：《统计与决策》2021年第21期93-97,共5页Statistics & Decision

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助项目(19BJY001);江苏省社会科学基金资助项目(19EYD006)。

摘　　要：文章以2000—2018年中国30个省份的面板数据为基础,建立了门槛回归模型进行实证检验。结果表明:环境规制及其与创新能级的交叉项与经济增长质量之间存在双重门槛效应,且表现出复合效应特征,创新能级向前沿面靠拢并越过不同门槛时,复合效应从显著的抑制叠加效应向不确定或正向累积效应转变,最终转变为显著的激励叠加效应。环境规制的复合效应存在区域异质性,东部地区为显著的激励叠加效应;中西部地区为正向累积效应,当前的创新能级水平距离环境规制能够产生显著的激励叠加效应的门槛值尚有提升空间。This paper is based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2000 to 2018 to establish a threshold regression model for empirical test. The results are as follows: There is a double threshold effect between environmental regulation and its intersection with innovation level and the quality of economic growth, showing the characteristics of compound effect. When the innovation level approaches the frontier and crosses different thresholds, the compound effect changes from a significant inhibitory superposition effect to an uncertain or positive cumulative effect, and finally to a significant incentive superposition effect. There is regional heterogeneity in the compound effect of environmental regulation, and the incentive superposition effect is significant in the eastern region.There is a positive cumulative effect in the central and western regions, still with room for improvement between the current innovation level and the threshold value at which environmental regulation can produce significant incentive superposition effect.

关 键 词：环境规制 创新能级 全要素生产率 双重红利 门槛效应 

分 类 号：F061.2[经济管理—政治经济学]