检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩志伟[1] 韩怀珠 HAN Zhi-wei;HAN Huai-zhu
机构地区:[1]吉林大学哲学基础理论研究中心暨哲学社会学院 [2]吉林大学哲学社会学院,长春130024
出 处:《吉林大学社会科学学报》2021年第6期42-49,230,231,共10页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(17BZX121)。
摘 要:在后冷战时代,"历史终结论"与"文明冲突论"成为西方观照人类文明前进方向的两种重要理论模式。"历史终结论"坚持抽象人性论立场,其出发点是作为个体的人;"文明冲突论"坚持狭隘的团伙意识,其出发点是作为团伙的人。二者最终陷入了抽象的普遍性与狭隘的特殊性之间的片面对立。只有通过实践观点的思维方式变革,只有从"社会化的人类"出发,才能突破"历史终结论"与"文明冲突论"的片面对立,为全人类命运与共、和谐相处的世界历史愿景奠定思维方式基础。立足于实践观点的思维方式,人类命运共同体理念实现了最大的公约性、具体的普遍性和现实的理想性,从而内在地超越了"历史终结论"和"文明冲突论"之间的片面对立。In the post-Cold War era,"the End of History"and"Clash of Civilizations"have become important theoretical models for the direction of human civilization development."The End of History adheres to the abstract human nature theory,and its starting point is the individual person,while the"Clash of Civilizations"adheres to the narrow sense of"group",and its starting point is the people as a group.The two eventually fell into a dichotomy between abstract universality and narrow particularity.Only through the reform of the thinking mode of practical viewpoints,and starting from the"socialized humanity",can we break through the confrontation between"the End of History"and the"Clash of Civilizations"and lay the foundation of the thinking mode for the vision of world history in which the destiny of all mankind live in harmony.Based on the thinking mode of practical viewpoints,the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind has realized the greatest convention,specific universality and realistic ideality,thus internally getting over the partial opposition between the viewpoints of"The End of History"and the"Clash of Civilizations".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222