机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院关节外科,广州510075 [2]中山大学附属第六医院康复科,广州510655
出 处:《中华关节外科杂志(电子版)》2021年第5期547-553,共7页Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition)
基 金:中山大学青年教师培育项目基金(20ykpy69);广东省科技计划项目基金(2017B020227005);广东省自然科学基金(2019A141401002)。
摘 要:目的研究基于手机应用程序(APP)进行远程术后康复指导和随访对全膝关节置换术后患者下肢疼痛、日常活动功能及运动功能表现的影响,为行全膝关节置换术患者建立一种科学、积极有效的康复管理方案提供参考。方法纳入中山大学附属第一医院关节外科自2019年3月至2019年10月收治的膝骨关节炎行全膝关节置换术患者,排除继发性关节炎及并发严重基础或精神等疾病患者。随机数字法分为两组,干预组出院后利用手机APP接受术后居家康复指导,对照组嘱患者遵医嘱进行居家康复训练,随访6个月后,比较两组疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分、起立行走测试(TUG)、单腿站立测试(SLS)及依从性评分。采用t检验和秩和检验进行统计分析。结果共分析患者资料60例,每组各30例。干预组患者的VAS评分和WOMAC总分、TUG和SLS测试时间及依从性评分均优于对照组且有统计学意义(t=2.37,P<0.05;t=2.566,P<0.05;Z=-3.507,P<0.05;t=-2.632,P<0.05)。其中,随访6个月后干预组及对照组VAS评分分别为(1.7±1.1)分和(2.5±1.3)分;WOMAC总分分别为(15.4±8.4)分和(21.2±8.9)分;TUG测试时间分别为8.8(8.0,12.3)s和12.0(10.0,15.0)s;SLS测试时间分别为(13.9±8.8)s和(8.4±4.4)s;依从性评分分别为(40.3±6.1)分和(30.9±9.6)分。而WOMAC量表疼痛条目和日常功能活动条目评分两组比较差别有统计学意义(t=2.472,P<0.05;t=2.327,P<0.05)。结论基于手机APP进行家庭康复训练指导及随访使患者具有更高的锻炼依从性且术后早期功能康复的效果更好,具有良好的临床应用价值。Objective To study the impact of remote postoperative rehabilitation guidance and follow-up based on the smartphone application(APP)on lower extremity pain,physical function and motor function performance in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.Methods The patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty due to knee osteoarthritis were recruited from the Joint Surgery Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between March 2019 to October 2019.The patients with secondary arthritis and severe underlying disease or mental diseases were excluded.The patients were randomly divided into two groups by random number table.During the follow-up,the intervention group conducted rehabilitation guidance and follow-up through the smartphone APP after discharge while the control group underwenttraditional home rehabilitation training instructed by doctors.After six months of follow-up,visual analog scale(VAS)of pain,Western Ontario and McMaster university osteoarthritis index scale(WOMAC),Time-up-and-go test(TUG),single leg stance test(SLS)and adherence scores were compared.The t test and rank sum test were used for statistical analysis.Results A total of 60 patients were analyzed with 30 in each group.The VAS score and total WOMAC score,TUG and SLS test time and adherence score of the intervention group were better than those of the control group(t=2.37,P<0.05;t=2.566,P<0.05;Z=-3.507,P<0.05;t=-2.632,P<0.05).Among them,after six months of follow-up,the VAS scores in the intervention group and the control group were(1.7±1.1)points and(2.5±1.3)points;WOMAC total scores were(15.4±8.4)and(21.2±8.9)points;TUG test time were 8.8(8.0,12.3)seconds and 12.00(10.0,15.0)seconds;SLS test time were(13.9±8.8)seconds and(8.4±4.4)seconds respectively;adherence scores were(40.3±6.1)points and(30.9±9.6)points,respectively.However,the difference between the scores of pain items and physical function items of the WOMAC scale were statistically significant(t=2.472,P<0.05;t=2.327,P<0.05).Conclusions Based on
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...