国际投资协议视野中的气候治理  

Climate Governance from the Perspective of International Investment Agreements

作　　者：魏艳茹[1] Wei Yanru

机构地区：[1]广西大学法学院,广西南宁530004

出　　处：《江西社会科学》2021年第9期193-200,255,256,共10页Jiangxi Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“国际投资规则创新的多元化路径研究”(18BFX215)。

摘　　要：全球气候治理与投资治理既重叠又存在差异,导致国际投资协议未能充分发挥支持气候治理的潜力。在涉及气候治理国际投资仲裁实践中,投资者经常援引以下条款:国民待遇和最惠国待遇、公平和公正的待遇、全面的保护和安全、征收。这些条款都可能阻碍气候治理。开展以支持气候治理为导向的国际投资协议改革,一要在序言中加入气候治理内容;二要完善投资保护条款,包括将气候治理目标列入国民待遇和最惠国待遇的应然考量因素,明言合法的气候治理措施不违反公平和公正的待遇、不构成征收,将全面的保护和安全限定为物理安全,协调ISDS机制与气候治理目标;三要扩大东道国的气候治理空间。Global climate governance and investment governance overlap and have differences, which leads to the failure of international investment agreements(IIAs) to fully realize their potential to support climate governance. In the practice of international investment arbitration involving climate governance, investors often invoke the following clauses: national treatment and most-favored-nation treatment, fair and equitable treatment, full protection and security, expropriation. These provisions may hinder climate governance. To carry out IIA reforms oriented to support climate governance, states should pay special attention to the following in their IIA drafting: Firstly, it is necessary to include climate governance wording in the preamble;Secondly, it is necessary to improve investment protection clauses, such as including climate governance objective in the consideration factors concerning national treatment and most-favored-nation treatment, making clear that legitimate climate governance measures do not constitute a breach of fair and equitable treatment and/or expropriation, and full protection and security means only physical security, coordinating ISDS mechanism with climate governance objectives;Thirdly, it is necessary to expand the host state’s climate governance space.

关 键 词：国际投资协议 气候变化 碳中和 投资仲裁 

分 类 号：D996.4[政治法律—经济法学]