“形义错配”概念的扩展与次类界定刍探  

On the Extension of the Concept“Syntax-Semantics Mismatches”and their Subcategories

作　　者：庄会彬 田良斌 刘振前 ZHUANG Huibin;TIAN Liangbin;LIU Zhenqian(School of Culture and Communication,Shandong University,Weihai 264209,China;Faculty of International Studies,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007,China;School of Foreign Languages,Qilu University of Technology,Jinan 250353,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学文化传播学院,山东威海264209 [2]河南师范大学外国语学院,河南新乡453007 [3]齐鲁工业大学外国语学院,山东济南250353

出　　处：《云南师范大学学报（对外汉语教学与研究版）》2021年第6期63-72,共10页Journal of Yunnan Normal University(Teaching & Studying Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition)

基　　金：2018年度国家社科基金重大项目“生成语法的汉语研究与新时代汉语语法理论创新”(18ZDA291)。

摘　　要：以往对“形义错配”的研究,主要围绕“伪定语”展开,涉及多种研究视角,产出大量的成果。然而,这一界定显然是把“形义错配”概念缩小了——伪定语所表现的形义不匹配现象,充其量只是形义错配的一种。理论上而言,形义错配还应存在一个广义上的界定,那就是句法成分在“形”和“义”上存在龃龉者,皆可称为形义错配。文章考察各类“形”“义”错配之可能,归纳了伪主语、伪谓语、伪宾语、伪定语、伪状语、伪补语六类。形义错配概念的重新界定或可启发更多思考。Though from different perspectives and with quite a few findings,the previous study of“syntax-semantics mismatches”mainly focuses on“pseudo-attributive”.However,such study is restricted to a narrow definition of“syntax-semantics mismatches”because“pseudo-attributive”is only one of such mismatches.Theoretically,there should be a broad definition of syntax-semantics mismatches,that is,if the“form”and the“meaning”of a syntactic component are not correspondent,a syntax-semantics mismatch would occur.This paper investigates possible form-meaning mismatches and sums up six categories:pseudo-subjects,pseudo-predicates,pseudo-objects,pseudo-attributives,pseudo-adverbials and pseudo-complements,which may shed some light on relevant studies.

关 键 词：形义错配 概念扩展 次类界定 

分 类 号：H14[语言文字—汉语]