“古史辨”是如何“运动”起来的?--从学术实践的角度来理解  被引量:1

How Did“Gu Shi Bian”Emerge and“Move”Forward?

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:马建强[1] Ma Jianqiang

机构地区:[1]湖北大学学报编辑部,武汉430062

出  处:《南京社会科学》2021年第11期170-178,共9页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

摘  要:古史辨运动是顾颉刚个人学术生涯的突破,奠定其一生学术事业的基础,也是现代学术体制下学术运动的一个典型案例。回到具体的历史场景,从学术实践的角度理解"古史辨"是如何"运动"起来的,可以发现从"层累观"的萌芽到声势浩大且有史学革命意义的古史辨运动并没有必然的联系,之所以"层累观"能够"运动"为"古史辨",得益于顾颉刚的"蓄意"和经营,期间"运动"新文化的老手钱玄同扮演了重要角色。"古史辨"的"运动"过程,折射了现代学术转型过程中史学发展和学人治学的一个侧面,顾颉刚对现代学术体制和学术传媒的运用是史学现代性的一个体现,也是他个人治学的宝贵经验,在其以后的学术生涯中,他如法炮制推动了学术发展也培养了史学后进。The Gu Shi Bian is a breakthrough and lay the foundation for Gu Jiegang’s personal academic career.It is also a typical case of the academic movement under the modern academic system.Going back to the specific historical scene and understanding how the“Gu Shi Bian”was“moved”from the perspective of academic practice,it can be found that there is no inevitable connection between the massive and revolutionary“Gu Shi Bian”and the emerging of the“Ceng Lei Guan”.The reason why the“Ceng Lei Guan”can“move”into“Gu Shi Bian”,was due to Gu Jiegang’s“deliberate”and management,while Qian Xuantong also played an important role,who was a veteran of the New Culture Movement.The“movement”of“Gu Shi Bian”reflects an aspect of historiography development and scholars’pursuing studies in the process of modern academic transformation.Gu Jiegang’s use of modern academic systems and academic media was a manifestation of the modernity of historiography as well as valuable experience of his personal study.In his later academic career,he followed the same pattern to promote academic development and also cultivated the historians.

关 键 词:古史辨运动 顾颉刚 层累观 

分 类 号:K09[历史地理—历史学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象