德国数字经济反垄断监管的实践与启示  

Practice and Lessons of Anti-monopoly Regulation of Digital Economy in Germany

作　　者：袁嘉[1,2] Yuan Jia

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院 [2]四川大学创新与竞争法研究中心

出　　处：《国际经济评论》2021年第6期56-76,5,共22页International Economic Review

摘　　要：德国数字经济反垄断监管走在世界前列,例如率先发布系列研究报告、积极执法、全面修法。德国竞争政策制定深受弗莱堡学派影响,重视构建经济秩序,坚持有限国家干预原则,强调垄断者的特殊义务。德国数字经济反垄断监管的成功之处在于重塑了更注重消费者保护的监管体系,优化了禁止滥用市场力量制度,并有效规制了数据垄断行为;不足之处在于并未让德国本土的数字平台企业发展起来,无法保障数字主权。中国应吸取德国的经验和教训,以完善社会主义市场经济为目标开展数字经济时代竞争政策的制定和完善,正确看待和处理数据问题,合理优化与平台相关的反垄断监管。Germany has been a leader in the world in terms of antitrust regulation in the field of digitaleconomy. It has led other countries in drafting a series of research reports, actively enforcingrelevant laws, and comprehensively amending the laws. Germany’s competition policy-makinghas been deeply influenced by the Freiburg School. It attaches importance to the government’sconstruction of economic order, adheres to the principle of limited state intervention, aims toachieve economic d’evelopment, and emphasizes the special obligations of monopolists. Thesuccess of Germanys antitrust regulation of digital economy lies in reshaping the regulatorysystem that pays more attention to consumer protection, optimizing the system that prohibitsthe abuse of market power, and effectively regulating data monopoly. However, it has failed inhelping the local digital platforms in Germany develop into major global players to ensure thecountry’s digital sovereignty. China should learn from the experiences and lessons ofGermany;it should aim to improve the socialist market economy, formulate and improve thecompetition policy in the era of digital economy, appropriately assess and deal with issue ofdata, and optimize the anti-monopoly supervision related to the platform in a reasonablemanner.

关 键 词：数字经济 反垄断 弗莱堡学派 数据 平台 

分 类 号：F49[经济管理—产业经济] D951.6[政治法律—法学] DD912.29