从犯减轻处罚疑难问题研究  

Research on Difficult Issues of Mitigating Punishment for Accessory Offender

作　　者：王泽 WANG Ze(School of Behavioral & Social Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Baltimore MD 20742, USA)

机构地区：[1]马里兰大学帕克分校行为与社会科学学院,美国巴尔的摩MD20742

出　　处：《安徽工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第4期13-16,共4页Journal of Anhui University of Technology：Social Sciences

摘　　要：从犯处罚问题的难点和焦点在于减轻处罚后可能导致的罪刑不均衡,更具象来说,是通过减轻处罚调整到下一量刑幅度后仍旧可能存在的刑罚畸重、罪刑难称问题。除此之外,学界对主从犯处罚时的比照问题、对“下一量刑幅度”(即“法定刑”)如何界定、对管制刑和单一量刑幅度如何减轻处罚等问题尚存争议。所以,在罪刑均衡原则下运用解释学原理,通过引入特别减轻处罚制度和发掘相关条文的实质内涵,是解决上述疑难的合理思路。The difficulty and focus of the problem of accessory punishment lies in the imbalance of crime and punishment that may result from mitigation,and more specifically,the problem of the possible existence of a disproportionate sentence and the difficulty of proportionality of crime and punishment even after adjusting to the next sentencing range through mitigation.In addition,there are controversies in academic circles about the comparison of the punishment of the principal and accomplice,the definition of the“next sentencing range”(i.e.,the“statutory penalty”),and the mitigation of the control sentence and the single sentencing range.Therefore,applying the principle of hermeneutics under the principle of balance of crime and punishment,by introducing a special mitigation system and discovering the substance of the relevant provisions,is a reasonable idea to solve the above-mentioned difficulties.

关 键 词：减轻处罚 罪刑均衡原则 特别减轻处罚制度 当然解释 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]