检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李琼 张蓝澜 李松林 刘毅 LI Qiong;ZHANG Lanlan;LI Songlin;LIU Yi(Qu Qiubai School of Government,Changzhou University,Changzhou 213159,Jiangsu,China;Jishou University Academician's Expert Workstation,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Jishou 416000,Hunan,China;Rennes School of Business,Rennes 35000,France;Business School,Jishou University,Jishou 416000,Hunan,China;Institute of Strategy Research for Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area,Guangzhou 510070,Guangdong,China;Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Bejing 100101,China)
机构地区:[1]常州大学瞿秋白政府管理学院,中国江苏常州213159 [2]中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所吉首大学院士专家工作站,中国湖南吉首416000 [3]法国雷恩高等商学院,法国雷恩35000 [4]吉首大学商学院,中国湖南吉首416000 [5]粤港澳大湾区战略研究院,中国广东广州510070 [6]中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,中国北京100101
出 处:《经济地理》2021年第9期12-21,共10页Economic Geography
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(2021BJY099);国家自然科学基金项目(71863009);湖南省自然科学基金项目(2020JJ4503);广东科学院人才专项(2020GDAsYL-20200102002)。
摘 要:以全国30个省(自治区、直辖市)为研究对象,综合运用标准差椭圆、空间自相关和空间回归模型来探讨2006—2018年中国普惠金融发展水平的时空演变及其影响因素,得到以下主要结论:(1)时序上:全国、四大区域及各省普惠金融发展水平呈现波动上升的趋势,但整体发展水平低下,2018年全国平均水平仍处于中等偏下类型。(2)空间上:中国普惠金融水平以上海和北京为相对高水平起点,主要向东部沿海地区和西部地区扩散,最终形成东西部地区高、中部地区低的"中部塌陷"的空间分布格局。普惠金融发展水平呈现出显著的空间聚集状态,高—高聚集区多位于中国东部沿海地区,低—低聚集区主要集中在中西部地区。(3)产业结构优化水平、交通基础设施、政府扶持力度、经济发展水平和城乡收入差距均对本地的普惠金融发展水平产生了显著的正向促进作用,其影响程度依次降低;经济发展水平、产业结构优化水平、金融发展效率和教育与科技所占比重产生了显著的空间溢出效应。Taking 30 provinces(municipalities and autonomous regions) in China as the research object, this paper comprehensively uses the methods of standard deviation ellipse, spatial auto-correlation, and spatial regression model to explore the spatio-temporal evolution of the development level of inclusive finance in China from 2006 to 2018 and its influencing factors. The following main conclusions are drawn: 1) From the perspective of time sequence, the development level of inclusive finance shows a fluctuating trend at the national, regional and provincial level, but the overall development level is low. In 2018,the national average level was still at the lower level of the medium level. 2)From the spatial perspective,it takes Shanghai and Beijing as the centers of high-value areas,and finally forms a spatial distribution pattern of "central collapse" with high levels in the eastern and western China and low levels in the central region. The development level of inclusive finance shows a significant spatial aggregation state. High-high agglomeration areas mostly locate in the east of China,while low-low agglomeration areas mainly concentrate in the central and western regions. 3) The optimization level of industrial structure, transportation infrastructure, government support, economic development level and urban-rural income gap all have a significant positive promoting effect on the development level of local inclusive finance,and the influence degree decreases successively. The level of economic development,the level of industrial structure optimization, the efficiency of financial development and the proportion of education and science and technology have a significant spatial spillover effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3